Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Rheinturm - Gesamtansicht vom Medienhafen.jpg

File:Rheinturm - Gesamtansicht vom Medienhafen.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Apr 2016 at 05:47:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Rheinturm - Gesamtansicht vom Medienhafen.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Rheinturm - Gesamtansicht vom Medienhafen.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Towers#Germany
•  Info all by Wladyslaw -- Wladyslaw (talk) 05:47, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
•  Support -- Wladyslaw (talk) 05:47, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
•  Neutral - There's a kind of majestic character to this tall and narrow picture, but I don't love the crop on the right side that cuts off a building. I might like the photo better if it were cropped just to the left of that building. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:41, 21 April 2016 (UTC)

This crop is because of the central composition of the tower. I have some reserve on both sides and I'll try a different crop. But nevertheless should the tower be here the main object. --Wladyslaw (talk) 07:17, 21 April 2016 (UTC)

I'm suggesting a crop that's even closer to the tower on its right! However, if you're able to show all of that building, I'd like to see that version. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:17, 21 April 2016 (UTC)

•  Support Good photo. Give us a excellent photo of the Lichtzeitpegel also... -- -donald- (talk) 11:12, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --Hubertl 17:30, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
•  Conditional oppose No color-space metadata and no embedded color profile. If that is fixed I am ready to support. Very good light and exposure control. I enjoyed exploring the fine details at the top of the tower. When seen in its entirety it does not wow me that much, but it is compensated by the light and details. -- Slaunger (talk) 19:19, 21 April 2016 (UTC)

  Slaunger: color-space is added. For future: if there is no such info feel free to add always "sRGB" because I'll never use a different. --Wladyslaw (talk) 05:47, 22 April 2016 (UTC)

  • Taxiarchos228: It is the EXIF which misses this information. That implies that an application which neeeds to convert the numbers in your file to colors have no information about how to do that. Most application will guess at sRGB, but there is no guarantee, especially not in the future. So an application may display colors entirely different from what you intended. You need to upload a version of the jpg, where the color space data are not stripped from the EXIF. See also User:Colin/BrowserTest. -- Slaunger (talk) 19:05, 22 April 2016 (UTC)

    • The information was added, no need for further editing any more. --Wladyslaw (talk) 08:29, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

      •  Support EXIF color space data checks out now. -- Slaunger (talk) 05:19, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
•  Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 02:20, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose Sharpening halos around the subject. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:51, 23 April 2016 (UTC)

  Sorry, but they aren't --Wladyslaw (talk) 08:30, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

  To make it more obvious, if you tilt your laptop/LCD screen up (so that you're looking at it at an angle from below), you'll see that the tower is clearly surrounded by a band of lightness. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:47, 26 April 2016 (UTC)

  +1 Yes, I see it clearly in the thumb too, perhaps from your HDR-Software? It's typical for that. But ... it isn't visible in full resolution!!! --Alchemist-hp (talk) 06:42, 26 April 2016 (UTC)

•  Support There might be halos, but I don't really see them when looking at my laptop screen straight on. Daniel Case (talk) 05:11, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
•  Support INeverCry 05:43, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --Ralf Roleček 21:04, 27 April 2016 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 1 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:49, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Towers#Germany