Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Ramparts of the historic fortified city of Carcassone 16.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Ramparts of the historic fortified city of Carcassone 16.jpg, not featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Jan 2019 at 00:29:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles and fortifications#France
- Info All by --Tournasol7 (talk) 00:29, 14 January 2019 (UTC)
- Abstain as author --Tournasol7 (talk) 00:29, 14 January 2019 (UTC)
- Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:15, 14 January 2019 (UTC)
- Support very good. Reminds me of one of my own images. --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:07, 14 January 2019 (UTC)
- Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 07:32, 14 January 2019 (UTC)
Support - Really good!-- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:47, 14 January 2019 (UTC)- Comment Some verticals of the higher towers seem to be a bit tilted to the left, espesially in the left half. --Milseburg (talk) 14:15, 14 January 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry but this is quite some level below the standards for Castles/Fortifications on Commons. I'm guessing you are using Lightroom's photo merge, rather than a dedicated package such as Hugin or PtGui. For architecture, these are essential in order to supply vertical alignment guidelines and appropriate projection adjustment. The horizon is titled strongly at both sides, the towers are all quite wonky, including the middle corner. The far left is blurred. Overall, it looks quite strongly vertically compressed. The light and shadow combination is unfortunate too. -- Colin (talk) 17:53, 14 January 2019 (UTC)
- Comment Yes, I use the Lightroom. Thanks for your review. Tournasol7 (talk) 19:16, 14 January 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose per Colin. It's quite dizzying to look at. – LucasT 18:07, 14 January 2019 (UTC)
- Comment - I've crossed out my vote and comment. I guess I was too absorbed with the details to notice the tilts mentioned above, but I see them now. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:49, 15 January 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose Nice idea, but the closer you get to either edge, the worse the flaws get, as Colin documents. Daniel Case (talk) 19:45, 15 January 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose per other --S. DÉNIEL (talk) 15:36, 21 January 2019 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 3 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 06:28, 23 January 2019 (UTC)