Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Río Tanana, Tok, Alaska, Estados Unidos, 2017-08-28, DD 158-170 PAN.jpg

File:Río Tanana, Tok, Alaska, Estados Unidos, 2017-08-28, DD 158-170 PAN.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Jan 2019 at 19:24:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Río Tanana, Tok, Alaska, Estados Unidos, 2017-08-28, DD 158-170 PAN.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Río Tanana, Tok, Alaska, Estados Unidos, 2017-08-28, DD 158-170 PAN.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural
•  Info Panoramic view of a landscape at the banks of the Tanana River near Tok, Alaska, United States. All by me, Poco² 19:24, 18 January 2019 (UTC)
•  Support -- Poco² 19:24, 18 January 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose Highlights too bright on the clouds and a yellowish cast that gets more noticeable at the edges, where it's also very unsharp. Daniel Case (talk) 02:58, 19 January 2019 (UTC)

  Daniel: I've "cooled" the image a bit, reduced the higlights and cropped a bit on the left. Please, consider that this image spans over aprox. 200 degrees and therefore it's to expect that the dynamic range is pretty big with strong shadows and highlights. The same applies to the "sharpness". When taking an image like this you focus manually to a spot (in this case the other side of the river) so that the focus does not change from frame to frame (in that case you'd have problems to stitch the panorama or diferences from frame to frame would be visible). The tradeoff is that items that are either further or closer from the focus point would not get the same sharpness. Btw, the image is made of 13 frames and has 135 MPx --Poco² 10:16, 19 January 2019 (UTC)

•  Support Totaly cool. --Podzemnik (talk) 20:05, 19 January 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose Composition does not work for me. Besides: The bridge at the very right of the image looks strangely curved - possibly due the the panoramic projection choosen here. --Tuxyso (talk) 06:29, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --Llez (talk) 21:25, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
•  Support -- I'm a fan of panoramics. :) MartinD (talk) 08:10, 23 January 2019 (UTC)
•  Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 10:31, 23 January 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Tuxyso. -- Karelj (talk) 08:32, 24 January 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 14:34, 24 January 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 08:10, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per others. The distortion here is too much and the view isn't mostly very interesting. -- Colin (talk) 16:57, 26 January 2019 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 7 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:24, 28 January 2019 (UTC)