Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Pyongyang DPR Korea.jpg

File:Pyongyang DPR Korea.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Apr 2010 at 13:52:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Pyongyang DPR Korea.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Pyongyang DPR Korea.jpg

•  Info created by USERNAME - uploaded by USERNAME - nominated by USERNAME -- Lawboy25 (talk) 13:52, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
•  Support -- Lawboy25 (talk) 13:52, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose (formerly FPX) Image does not fall within the guidelines, little detail can be seen in this picture and the horizon is tilted -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 15:22, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
•  Support despite the fog. Kleuske (talk) 10:39, 14 April 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose Unclear because of the fog. Jafeluv (talk) 23:29, 14 April 2010 (UTC)
•  Comment Fog is a natural climatic condition which commonly affects this city; such a representation is apropos and instructive in my view.--Lawboy25 (talk) 15:48, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Jafeluv. --патриот8790 (talk) 13:36, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
•  Comment Citing fog as a detraction is not very credible. This city is often shrouded in fog: it is another aspect of the reality of life there. Moreover, the horizon is not tilted (cf. the bridges and tower of Juche); rather, the topography is different on the left and right of the river. --Lawboy25 (talk) 14:24, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
•  Support - so it's a foggy day, not every photo has to be superdetailed, you know there can be photos of foggy scenes - it's not a bad thing to make them.--Avala (talk) 12:30, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
  • Of course there can, and I wasn't arguing that it was a bad thing. It's a valuable photo, even if not quite featured quality. Jafeluv (talk) 13:32, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
    • And also there are so many photos of North Korea on here and so few marco bugs and flowers... ;) --Lawboy25 (talk) 17:14, 21 April 2010 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 3 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 15:15, 22 April 2010 (UTC)