Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Processional Way, Babylon - Google Art Project.jpg

File:Processional Way, Babylon - Google Art Project.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Jul 2021 at 08:35:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Processional Way, Babylon - Google Art Project.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Processional Way, Babylon - Google Art Project.jpg

• Gallery: commons:Featured_pictures/Non-photographic_media/Others#Historical
•  Info created by Staatliche Museen zu Berlin - uploaded by Dcoetzee - nominated by Andrew J.Kurbiko -- Andrei (talk) 08:35, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
•  Support -- Andrei (talk) 08:35, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
•  Support What a resolution! --XRay 💬 09:14, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
•  Support --IamMM (talk) 09:59, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
•  Support Incredibly detailed! -- Radomianin (talk) 10:22, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
•  Support--Llez (talk) 15:06, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
•  Support Buidhe (talk) 16:24, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
•  Comment This file is unreasonably large, in that it is blurry at 30%. It's pretty sharp at 400% of full screen on my laptop (13-inch screen), but I think this is a good candidate for drastic downsizing, as the larger resolutions are entirely unusable. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:03, 19 July 2021 (UTC)

  I think it might be the issue of software, because for me its pretty sharp with any resolution. --Andrei (talk) 22:28, 19 July 2021 (UTC)

• Firefox 90.0 in a Windows 8.1 environment. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:46, 19 July 2021 (UTC)

• The library browser im using wasnt able to open it at all, but ive managed to do that in windows photo viewer after downloading the file. --Andrei (talk) 08:43, 20 July 2021 (UTC)

I think the browsers just give up and display a preview quality image that looks awful at full size. This one needs downloaded and opened in an image program, or use the zoom viewer. -- Colin (talk) 15:39, 20 July 2021 (UTC)

•  Support Thank you. The zoom viewer is working well, and the photo is just as extraordinary as everyone is saying. It's odd, though, because I usually have no trouble viewing even very large photos at full resolution in my normal browser. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:59, 20 July 2021 (UTC)

•  Support --Ooligan (talk) 21:16, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
•  Support Very detailed and sharp -- Basile Morin (talk) 23:36, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
•  Support Daniel Case (talk) 05:34, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
•  Support --Aristeas (talk) 08:58, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:52, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
•  Support --Schnobby (talk) 06:33, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
•  Support.--Vulp❯❯❯here! 10:42, 24 July 2021 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--MZaplotnik^(talk) 13:56, 24 July 2021 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Non-photographic_media/Others#Historical