Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Praia de Area Maior. Louro. Muros. Galiza K.jpg

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

File:Praia de Area Maior. Louro. Muros. Galiza K.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Oct 2015 at 17:22:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Beach of Area Maior, Louro, Muros, Galicia, (Spain).
  • I'm not agree with you. Amazing, in my opinion. I have no doubt that occur because my name is not one, I find no other possible justification. Thanks.
es: Los arbustos de la derecha equilibran la imagen, no estorban, aportan equilibrio. Que la parte izquierda carezca de interés para usted es algo que por mi parte es mejor que quede sin comentar: ¿sabe usted lo que es el contraste de espacios y de colores?--Lmbuga (talk) 20:23, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • (Sorry I don't understand that language.) I think composition is very subjective, I prefer without pine trees on the right side, that's my opinion and just my opinion so do not worry I always get opposing to my comments --Laitche (talk) 20:48, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
You say this "Nice colors but agree with sting about the composition and the pine trees on the right side are disturbing", but (es:) sting criticaba el lado izquierdo: ¿De que habla usted? ¿Cree usted que se comporta con seriedad? ¿Como se suma a una crítica diciendo algo que no tiene nada que ver? USTED HABLA DEL LADO CONTRARIO AL QUE HABLA STING: SERIOUS, PLEASE--Lmbuga (talk) 21:22, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, with respect, I do not agree. But I'm not one for you--Lmbuga (talk) 21:34, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • A good rule of composition in landscape photography (of course, it's not carved in stone): foreground subject, second plan (here the beach) and background (here the mountain). Here your foreground is occupied by regularly set dry grass, not eye-catching and at the limit of DoF, particularly at the left. The pine trees are set at the sides and get lost... or are too present; I'm undecided about their status. The right one, like Laitche wrote (and that's why I was talking about PoV), is invading and hiding the beach but hasn't force enough to get above the horizon; that's why I don't think it balances the composition. And about contrast of colors and spaces, right. But your foreground lacks color and is a prominent mass of undistinguishable grass taking too much space compared to what you want to show as the subject of the image. I don't know the place but my recommendation, if you allow me, would be to go a few steps to the right and closer to these pine trees in order to give them a reasonable height to counterbalance the mountain and set them as foreground subject, at the right. Mountain at the half left, getting rid of the left pine trees (or the pine trees at the left and the mountain at the center-right, depending how you can set the composition to show the beach). A lower sun, with more appealing light may also help. Your image is nice but a bit too common in my opinion. Hope this helps. Sting (talk) 21:44, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • PS: and don't be so worried about your language or your “name”. ;-)
  • PS2: When I vote or comment here, I try – at least – to be constructive [with arguments] (edit) and transmit my little experience/knowledge for the photographer better his work. It isn't always well accepted [and I may be wrong] (edit), but that's part of the deal. And on the other hand, if one nominator here expects only praises about his work, well, imo he's in the wrong place because it's about voting here, that means accepting hearing about pros and cons, which should lead to a bettering of the work (again, my opinion). If it's only about promotion, barnstars, medals and self-promotion, I suggest to turn towards the social networks.
Too many words (unable to read, sorry). Do you know someone than can translate it. Imposible understand it to me. Sorry. (I'm sure that this is not a mutiligual proyect: It's a English covert proyect)--Lmbuga (talk) 22:01, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I do not agree, sorry.--Lmbuga (talk) 22:03, 1 October 2015 (UTC)--Lmbuga (talk) 22:03, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I do not know write in Spanish but I can translate it in Portuguese if it helps. Sting (talk) 22:08, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, your words has not signature. Sorry, can I say this: why? Sorry: I'm not one for you and for the usuals--Lmbuga (talk) 22:14, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry but I didn't understand what you mean or wanted to say. Sting (talk) 22:19, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks: Eu entendo português muito bem, but your words has not signature: I'm not idiot--Lmbuga (talk) 22:22, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Não entendo o que você quer dizer com "as palavras não tem assinatura". Os "PS" e "PS2" (para "post scriptum") são eu que escrevi. Mas acho melhor deixar esta conversa aí. Boa noite. Sting (talk) 22:32, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Boa noite (mas as palavras que você (ou outro usuário) me dirigiu não foram assinadas). Amanhã é outro dia--Lmbuga (talk) 22:43, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  •  I withdraw my nomination Eu não quero continuar a falar sobre isso: eu não sou nada. --Lmbuga (talk) 22:57, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    • "PS" é para "post scriptum", quer dizer "[nota] depois da assinatura". É por isso que não assinei novamente e que coloquei ao mesmo nível que o texto principal. Não vejo qual outro texto não tem assinatura. Aliás, não vejo qual o problema de entendimento das frazes, mesmo sem assinatura. Sting (talk) 23:07, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
      • Opá! Não vai começar a chorar, né?! Não assassinei sua foto: tentei te dar dicas para melhorar ela para uma futura tomada. Se não quer ou aceitar, tudo bem. Sting (talk) 23:07, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Just a final (and personal) comment/consideration: imho, FPC is not only about promoting (or rejecting) one picture, but also in bettering the taking of the photograph, eventually with new shots. What else would be the point of an argumented opposing vote? (not the first time writing this, but well, I see it needs to be repeated...) Sting (talk) 23:31, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Just a final (and personal) comment/consideration: I am nobody. You know--Lmbuga (talk) 01:06, 2 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    • Galego: As palabras de Sting, non cabe dúbida, véxase o último que di, son as palabras dun bo compañeiro e as dun verdadeiro amigo: Non estamos aquí para fodérmonos (IRONIA). I'mnot jeb--Lmbuga (talk) 01:12, 2 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]