Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Porte musc perspective 5.jpg

File:Porte musc perspective 5.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Apr 2011 at 19:19:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Porte musc perspective 5.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Porte musc perspective 5.jpg

•  Info created by -- Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 19:19, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
•  Support -- Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 19:19, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
•  Comment I think it would be much better if this kind of fotos would be a bit less exposed. --Mile (talk) 22:11, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
•  Support--Miguel Bugallo 22:47, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
•  Support --Schnobby (talk) 06:51, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
•  Support Nice quality, interesting object -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 07:50, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
•  Support--Citron (talk) 09:45, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose Not the best lighting. W.S. 09:54, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
•  Comment I had already noticed your allergy to light! --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 10:07, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
•  Support H. Krisp (talk) 16:47, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
•  Support --Llez (talk) 19:32, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
•  Support Ggia (talk) 21:10, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
•  Support --Böhringer (talk) 21:28, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose I don't think good care was given on the context removal, and I'm curious to see the original to check if I'm right. This is otherwise a standard picture of a museum object (but good quality, detail and valuable for encyclopedia). This time I oppose, but that won't change the fate of this FP candidate. - Benh (talk) 21:35, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose -- Let the poor thing breathe! -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 21:44, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
•  Support There's enough space around the object here imo. --Cayambe (talk) 08:31, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
•  Support The light is fine IMO (no overexposure at all). The space around is sufficient to my taste. The best "Commons" can offer for this kind of images, IMO. FP to me.--Jebulon (talk) 21:22, 31 March 2011 (UTC)

Alternative

• But its even worst to have alergy to shadows, you know, Scooby Doo can never sleep well . So a at such good and valuable fotos is good not to have overblown highligths and more natural (browny) colors. --Mile (talk) 12:55, 30 March 2011 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 19:29, 8 April 2011 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects

The chosen alternative is: File:Porte_musc_perspective_5.jpg