Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Poertschach Johannes-Brahms-Promenade Promenadenbad Rutschenturm 25122015 9840 169crop.jpg

File:Poertschach Johannes-Brahms-Promenade Promenadenbad Rutschenturm 25122015 9840 169crop.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Jan 2016 at 20:54:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Poertschach Johannes-Brahms-Promenade Promenadenbad Rutschenturm 25122015 9840 169crop.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Poertschach Johannes-Brahms-Promenade Promenadenbad Rutschenturm 25122015 9840 169crop.jpg

6233

1453

161

121

7173

4035

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
•  Info created by Johann Jaritz - uploaded by Colin - nominated by Colin -- Colin (talk) 20:54, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
•  Support See related Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Poertschach Johannes-Brahms-Promenade Promenadenbad Rutschenturm 29122015 9896.jpg. This is another view of the same subject, taken four days earlier. I think this is a better composition. Since the scene and date are different, I don't think it can simply be offered as an Alternative within that nomination. Feel free to support/oppose one or both images as you see fit. -- Colin (talk) 20:54, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
•  Support Better than the alternative, both are very good imo. — Julian H.^✈ 21:01, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
•  Support Because I know this position very well, it is a different composition for me. In this case, the water sliding tower is the central subjekt (looking to south west) the other is focusing to a wider angle directly to west, to the end of the lake, facing a complete different country side. Therefore, for me are both worth being featured. To let know and avoid misunderstandings: I grew up at this lake but I wasn´t there, when the picture was taken. --Hubertl 21:05, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
•  Support The composition is better here, IMO the image will win to have a less blue WB, a bit as in the other image, maybe with a bit more of clarity too. Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 21:28, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
•  Support OK, this one works too. Daniel Case (talk) 23:31, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
•  Support INeverCry 00:41, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
•  Support - As I mentioned in the other thread, I prefer this photo. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:36, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
•  Support Also fine to me. --Cayambe (talk) 09:59, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
•  Support great! --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 10:29, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
•  Support Nice composition and the mood. --Laitche (talk) 11:30, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 14:36, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
•  Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 19:15, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
•  Support The other is good, but this one is better (to me).--Jebulon (talk) 20:28, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:47, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
•  Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:44, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:22, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 14:54, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --Ximonic (talk) 14:06, 9 January 2016 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 18 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /— TintoMeches, 00:58, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture

The chosen alternative is: File:Poertschach_Johannes-Brahms-Promenade_Promenadenbad_Rutschenturm_25122015_9840_169crop.jpg