Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Pinnacles gnangarra-60.jpg

File:Pinnacles gnangarra-60.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Jun 2012 at 02:28:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Pinnacles gnangarra-60.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Pinnacles gnangarra-60.jpg

•  Info created, uploaded, nominated by Gnangarra -- Gnangarra 02:28, 27 May 2012 (UTC)
•  Support -- Gnangarra 02:28, 27 May 2012 (UTC)
•  Oppose== Sorry but great in the art, not in the featurable content... I understand the composition, but a featurable composition showing the features would have extended more on the right and less on the vertical dimension...--Telemaque MySon (talk) 15:44, 27 May 2012 (UTC)
  • the subject for which you dismiss as not featurable content, by ignoring the fact The pinnacle formations are best viewed in the early morning or late afternoon as the play of light brings out the colours .....[1]. Thankyou I appreciated your compliment of dismissing it as great art therefore not featurable content, I prefer to make great rather than just featurable. Gnangarra 17:15, 27 May 2012 (UTC)
•  Support --Tomascastelazo (talk) 22:44, 27 May 2012 (UTC)
•  Oppose Problematic colors Zivya (talk) 11:26, 28 May 2012 (UTC)
  • can you please explain whats problematic about the colours? Gnangarra 23:28, 28 May 2012 (UTC)
•  Neutral Nice but very dark. I don't mind the colors, but the light is really not that good. --Paolo Costa (talk) 14:28, 28 May 2012 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Zivya--David საქართველო 14:48, 28 May 2012 (UTC)

•  I withdraw my nomination Gnangarra 06:44, 29 May 2012 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 3 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:10, 5 June 2012 (UTC)