Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Pingualuit aerial 2007.jpg

File:Pingualuit aerial 2007.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Jan 2019 at 10:25:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Pingualuit aerial 2007.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Pingualuit aerial 2007.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural
•  Info created by NASA / Denis Sarrazin, uploaded by Tillman, nominated by Yann (talk) 10:25, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
•  Support The perfect circular shape of the crater and lake is stricking. -- Yann (talk) 10:25, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose Sorry, it's a nice motif, but the technical quality is really crappy. The chroma noise is off the hook and the level of detail makes me think this was taken by some local guy with a drone rather than the biggest space exploration association in the world.--Peulle (talk) 15:36, 5 January 2019 (UTC)

@Peulle: Why so much hyperbole? Yann (talk) 15:45, 5 January 2019 (UTC)

• Perhaps I was. But jokes aside - honestly, I don't want to appear insulting, but why did you even nominate this one? I really can't see how this belongs here. Do you honestly and objectively believe this is an FP in 2019? --Peulle (talk) 17:03, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
• Yann the NASA page says the image was "from an airplane on October 12, 2007" and the EXIF says it was a Canon EOS 30D that took it. The EXIF doesn't indicate this is a stitched image so I think the NASA webpage has upsized the 8.2MP image to 24MP. It should really be 3504 × 2336. I would probably support this, but reluctant to support an upsized JPG. -- Colin (talk) 17:37, 5 January 2019 (UTC)

Actually, Peulle, you meant to say "off the scale". I don't think anybody had blamed the chroma noise for anything. Daniel Case (talk) 21:50, 5 January 2019 (UTC)

•  Oppose per Peulle. Daniel Case (talk) 21:49, 5 January 2019 (UTC)

 I withdraw my nomination Thanks for your comments. Yann (talk) 05:07, 6 January 2019 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /MZaplotnik^(talk) 15:10, 6 January 2019 (UTC)