Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Patio de los Arrayanes detail Alhambra Granada Spain.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Patio de los Arrayanes detail Alhambra Granada Spain.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Nov 2013 at 09:37:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Info all by me-- Jebulon (talk) 09:37, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
- Support View of the Patio de los arrayanes (patio of the myrtles), 13th-century, inside of the Nasrid palaces, Alhambra, Granada, Spain.-- Jebulon (talk) 09:37, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
- Support -- -donald- (talk) 09:52, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
- Comment Very nice IMO but I think a crop at top (above the windows) will maybe improve the composition (see note).-- Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:09, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
- I disagree, cher Christian. Ce serait un perte d'information. It should be a lost of information.--Jebulon (talk) 12:43, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
- Support Anyway nice like that. -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:01, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
- Question Does the file allow de-clipping the wall? — Julian H.✈ (talk/files) 13:06, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
- The overexposition (if any) seems to be perfectly acceptable, IMO.--Jebulon (talk) 14:43, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
- I'm not saying it's not acceptable, but if it would be possible to not clip both the red and the green channel across the upper part of the photo, the texture of the wall wouldn't be lost and I think that would improve the image. I'll probably support even if the answer is “no”. — Julian H.✈ (talk/files) 15:04, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
- Sorry for misunderstanding. I'm not sure I understand what you mean by "de-clipping the wall". May be a part of the answer is : no, I don't own more the RAW file (it is an "old" picture, summer 2012, my Mac definitely crashed down since this period, and of course I did note save my previous RAW files...)--Jebulon (talk) 15:12, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
- Yes, without the RAW, there's nothing to do about it. In any case, a very nice photo. Support. — Julian H.✈ (talk/files) 15:19, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
- The overexposition (if any) seems to be perfectly acceptable, IMO.--Jebulon (talk) 14:43, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
- Support Sweet memories. :) JKadavoor Jee 16:30, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
- Support Featurable as it is to me. --Myrabella (talk) 19:23, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
- Support Good job. Blurred Lines 04:24, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
- Support Poco2 14:07, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
- Support --JLPC (talk) 15:57, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
- Support M49314 (talk) 17:05, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
- Support --Joydeep Talk 17:47, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
- Support Michael Barera (talk) 04:15, 10 November 2013 (UTC)
- Support Great! The pure symmetrical and careful composition coupled with the reflections on the water make this shot really special. --Tuxyso (talk) 07:09, 10 November 2013 (UTC)
- Support St1995 16:33, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture