Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Parc Champs sur Marne perspective.jpg

File:Parc Champs sur Marne perspective.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Jun 2012 at 15:49:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Parc Champs sur Marne perspective.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Parc Champs sur Marne perspective.jpg

•  Info all by me-- Jebulon (talk) 15:49, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
•  Support "Grande Perspective" of almost 1 km in the park of the castle of Champs-sur-Marne, Seine-et-Marne, France. did you notice the wedding couple ? -- Jebulon (talk) 15:49, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
•  Support Tomer T (talk) 15:59, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
•  Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:14, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
•  Oppose Nice shot, but rather simple & ordinary... Sorry. - A.Savin 16:22, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
  •  CommentNo need to be sorry. But the married couple with the photographer gives a special "touch", not so ordinary IMO...--Jebulon (talk) 17:02, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
    • Right, you may guess a wedding couple if you click on 100% view and - even better - take a magnifying glass... ;) But I suppose, this place is quite frequently being visited by wedding couples, isn't it? - A.Savin 17:22, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
      • Really don't know. If you think so, maybe the place is not so simple and ordinary ? ;). They were there, I was there too... But don't judge what a photographed place could be, but what you see.. And btw, I hope every review here is made at 100%... not sure ?--Jebulon (talk) 18:45, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
      • I do know. It is frequently visited by brides, and I did myself photographed some friends there. Not sure this is useful comment for review though ;) - Benh (talk) 21:27, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
      • Yes it is ! If it is frequently visited by brides, it means that the place is not so simple or ordinary ! Who wants a picture of his wedding taken in an ordinary place ;))!--Jebulon (talk) 22:36, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
        • That's not the place itself what I meant, but rather the composition, the overall atmosphere etc. Making a truly featured image, requires some creativity rather than just a good-quality shot (you should know how). But in the end, it's just my very humble personal point... - A.Savin 23:36, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
•  Support Nice.-- Raghith 06:52, 13 June 2012 (UTC)
•  Oppose boring symmetric composition will not be upgraded by a far away wedding couple which hasn't actually a context with the park itself --Wladyslaw (talk) 09:29, 13 June 2012 (UTC)
•  Support --High Contrast (talk) 17:13, 13 June 2012 (UTC)
•  Oppose: The married couple is hardly visible, not relevant for the composition. What matters is that the foreground is just too much boring ground. --Julian H. (talk/files) 17:41, 13 June 2012 (UTC)
  • I understand what you mean, but if I crop the foreground, I just destroy the famous 1km long "Grand Perspective" you can see here in whole. Thanks for review anyway.--Jebulon (talk) 20:17, 13 June 2012 (UTC)
•  Request try to crop 50% from the sky and 50% from the uninteresting foreground! And you see a better image. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 22:06, 13 June 2012 (UTC)

• Thanks for supporters and honest reviewers, but  I withdraw my nomination--Jebulon (talk) 00:03, 14 June 2012 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 5 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 17:04, 20 June 2012 (UTC)