Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Panorama of Kaisergebirge near Steinbergalm.jpg

File:Panorama of Kaisergebirge near Steinbergalm.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Nov 2012 at 20:49:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Panorama of Kaisergebirge near Steinbergalm.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Panorama of Kaisergebirge near Steinbergalm.jpg

4891

1818

404

565

24252

3918

stitching error

18714

1111

505

505

24252

3918

flare or dust spot

303

3756

22534

141

24252

3918

artifact

•  Info created by User:Ximeg - uploaded by User:Ximeg - nominated by User:Ximeg -- Ximeg (talk) 20:49, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
•  Support -- Ximeg (talk) 20:49, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
•  Support --Stas1995 (talk) 21:50, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
•  Oppose Impressive landscape, but there's CA and a dust spot (or maybe flare), also a stitching error in the tree (I added notes). I also find the upper right crop a bit too tight on the mountain, sorry. --Kadellar (talk) 22:07, 4 November 2012 (UTC)

Well, I still have the source files, so I can easily correct the tree and may be even the flare. According to crop - The mountain was really close and high, so... may be if I play a bit with projection, it would be possible to give more space above. --Ximeg (talk) 08:47, 5 November 2012 (UTC)

I'll wait for the new version and then I'll review it again. --Kadellar (talk) 15:25, 5 November 2012 (UTC)

 Info New version with lots of improvement was uploaded. --Ximeg (talk) 15:17, 6 November 2012 (UTC)

Much better now, thanks for your reworking. I change to  Neutral. --Kadellar (talk) 14:09, 7 November 2012 (UTC)

•  Comment Many artifacts on the basis --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:51, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
•  Oppose Uninteresting framing and composition. Being large and with acceptable quality is not enough. Alvesgaspar (talk) 19:47, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
•  Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 19:32, 7 November 2012 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 3 support, 1 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /A.Savin 22:31, 13 November 2012 (UTC)