Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Paneles solares en Cariñena, España, 2015-01-08, DD 09-12 PAN.JPG

File:Paneles solares en Cariñena, España, 2015-01-08, DD 09-12 PAN.JPG, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Jun 2015 at 14:16:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Paneles solares en Cariñena, España, 2015-01-08, DD 09-12 PAN.JPG Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Paneles solares en Cariñena, España, 2015-01-08, DD 09-12 PAN.JPG

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Industry
•  Info Panoramic view of the photovoltaic power station of Cariñena, Zaragoza, Spain. The panels are mounted on dual axis trackers in order to maximise the intensity of incoming direct radiation. This solution enables the arrays to track the sun in its daily orbit. Poco² 14:16, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Support -- Poco² 14:16, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Support nice composition. --Kadellar (talk) 14:37, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Support nice composition, nice light, nice sky but bad news... stitching errors. --Laitche (talk) 14:56, 23 May 2015 (UTC) fixed. --Laitche (talk) 18:03, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Support I suggest litle +contrast and move curve a bit down, its better. Now too brigth. This would be Sci-Fi photo without that tree. --Mile (talk) 15:09, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Very good and as already mentioned very futuristic - looks more like artwork than a photovoltaic power station. I found a another stitching error (see note) but I am sure Diego will fix it soon. --Tuxyso (talk) 15:34, 23 May 2015 (UTC)

 New version uploaded adressing all issues mentioned here (also yours Iifar) Poco² 17:32, 23 May 2015 (UTC)

•  Comment Stitching errors are fixed but moiré appear instead... --Laitche (talk) 18:03, 23 May 2015 (UTC) disappeared. --Laitche (talk) 18:54, 23 May 2015 (UTC)

   Moiré gone, thanks! Poco² 18:42, 23 May 2015 (UTC)

•  Support I Love this original things,good quality too --LivioAndronico talk 19:54, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Daniel Case (talk) 03:46, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Support though a bit hazier than I would have liked. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:42, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Support  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 08:12, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Comment I'm not sure if there is a caching problem, but I see a very strong stitching problem with the fence post on the right side. — Julian H.^✈ 10:55, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

• Yes, the fences are disappearing or appearing. --Laitche (talk) 11:31, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

• Oops, how could I miss that? I tried some editing but finally came to the conclusion that the best I can do with the fence is getting rid of it, at least in the middle. Therefore I cropped it and did some minor editing Poco² 14:45, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

• Better. :) A weak  Support from me then, because the place really is very cool but the clipping in the middle is quite large in area. — Julian H.^✈ 14:50, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

•  Support -- Pofka (talk) 15:24, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Great idea and composition, perfect lighting, reasonable quality. Pity for the CA on the fenceposts to the left. --Kreuzschnabel 17:09, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

   CA gone, that was easy Poco² 17:33, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

•  Comment The image has huge wow. There is a CA on the fence poles to the left, but it is acceptable for me given the large resolution. I am a little confused about the horizontal angle of view. Could you please indicate that on the file page. A geolocation would also be helpful for understanding better the layout of the solar power plant.-- Slaunger (talk) 19:44, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

  Slaunger:  Done It looks like I uploaded the wrong version, the version uploaded now is free of CA. I also added the geodata Poco² 22:34, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

   Support Thanks, and I double-checked; it really is gone now. One thing that puzzles me is why the center panel is horizontally aligned? Is it malfunctioning or under service? Do you know? It gives a striking effect and adds a lot to the wow for me. -- Slaunger (talk) 19:24, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

  Sorry Slaunger, I forgot to answer your question (and realized as I asked you something else in your FPC). I cannot say it with certainty but after asking 3 guys who have some studies in this area, 2 of them agree that the panel in the front is malfunctioning and that position is the most stable against the wind. Poco² 18:27, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

•  Support--Jebulon (talk) 20:22, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Code (talk) 11:50, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Jacopo Werther ^iγ∂ψ=mψ 18:11, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Yann (talk) 20:35, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Böhringer (talk) 05:59, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:50, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Tremonist (talk) 12:52, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Halavar (talk) 20:15, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 21 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 04:49, 29 May 2015 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Industry