Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:PakistanConsulateHouston.JPG

Voting period ends on 16 Jan 2009 at 20:08:21

Info created by WhisperToMe - uploaded by WhisperToMe - nominated by WhisperToMe -- WhisperToMe (talk) 20:08, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- I like the lighting and the landscaping in this shot - plus I haven't heard of a consulate getting a featured picture - WhisperToMe (talk) 20:08, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose -- Composition (too much tree, not enough consulate) Snowwayout (talk) 01:29, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support I agree with Snow somewhat, but that's a pine tree, and we can't really rewrite reality, and it does give a pleasant atmosphere to the scene. It would be nice, however, if the tree branches in the upper left weren't there, perhaps by photographing from a couple steps forwards of that point, or kneeling down, to get it from a lower angle. The technical quality of the photography looks good to me, and I'm sure that our photographers will chime in if there's problems that my eyes are not trained to see. Frankly, all these really big, multi-layer images of architecture look a little blurry to me at full view in some areas, but I've always presumed that that's because the extra resolution which helps them print better puts it beyond the optical limits of the camera to focus on all areas of the scene at once. Adam Cuerden (talk) 14:30, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Composition; where is the WOW? —kallerna™ 19:30, 8 January 2009 (UTC)

result: 2 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Ö 21:14, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Navigation menu