Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Olhos de um gato-3.jpg

File:Olhos de um gato-3.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Sep 2010 at 12:01:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Olhos de um gato-3.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Olhos de um gato-3.jpg

•  Info created by Mark J Sebastian and tm- uploaded by tm - nominated by hoverFly | chat? –hoverFly | chat? 12:01, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
•  Support –hoverFly | chat? 12:01, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose DOF too shallow, noisy, looks oversharpened. --The High Fin Sperm Whale 17:00, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
•  Request Good cat portrait/close-up, but can you do something about the chromatic aberration on the whiskers? --IdLoveOne (talk) 19:12, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose -- In my opinion there is no reason for the small DOF, which makes the muzzle and whiskers out of focus. Please check the category, there are some much better pictures of the subject. Also, the image seems oversaturated (see the noise in the background) -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 21:00, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
  • What does oversaturation have to do with noise? --The High Fin Sperm Whale 21:50, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
    • Nothing really, but is clearly visible in the noisy parts of the bkg. When a picture is manipulated in order to increase saturation, sometimes there is an obvious effect in the aspect of the noise, which becomes posterized. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 22:52, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose Sorry, the dof is too short here and the color variation in the background is disturbing. Also, the quote in the description should be correctly referenced if copyrighted. --Quartl (talk) 09:49, 16 September 2010 (UTC)
•  I withdraw my nomination –hoverFly | chat? 12:47, 16 September 2010 (UTC)