Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Oščadnica, Slovakia - chapel.JPG

File:Oščadnica, Slovakia - chapel.JPG, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Mar 2015 at 10:34:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Oščadnica, Slovakia - chapel.JPG Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Oščadnica, Slovakia - chapel.JPG

•  Info all by Pudelek -- Pudelek (talk) 10:34, 14 March 2015 (UTC)
•  Support -- Pudelek (talk) 10:34, 14 March 2015 (UTC)
•  Weak Support. I like it, but it isn't very high resolution and is a bit soft. I think it would benefit from sharpening. Diliff (talk) 11:19, 14 March 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose Nice but not outstanding: too little detail and too soft regarding the low resolution, not much whow too. Would probably gain wow if taken from a lower viewpoint to make the chapel appear larger. --Kreuzschnabel 11:23, 14 March 2015 (UTC)
•  Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 13:20, 14 March 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose Pathetic when photographers upload and nominate their own photos. Too me it's like nominating yourself to an Oscar. Just saying... --Nobelpeopleuploader (talk) 17:03, 14 March 2015 (UTC)
•  Neutral There is nothing pathetic to get own picture reviewed if the author sees it as a highlight. Otherwise for some it would be very difficult to be even found. Unlike the oscar movies which usually tend to have big advertising campaigns. I give this neutral because it's a good picture of the subject with nice mood but maybe not outstanding enough as a whole. But nice enough not to oppose. --Ximonic (talk) 17:24, 14 March 2015 (UTC)
•  Neutral The composition is very good but the sharpness should be much better. --Code (talk) 18:32, 14 March 2015 (UTC)
• Weak  Support. Excellent lighting and composition, but sharpness could be better especially at 6 MP. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:28, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
•  Weak support Per King --LivioAndronico talk 12:39, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 20:46, 17 March 2015 (UTC) Cienie troszkę za głębokie, ale podoba mi się .
•  Support. --Brateevsky {talk} 10:14, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose QI definitely, but not over the wow threshold. Daniel Case (talk) 14:36, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Halavar (talk) 15:11, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Tremonist (talk) 14:46, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 2 oppose, 2 neutral → featured. /KTC (talk) 20:58, 23 March 2015 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Religious buildings