Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Nuraghe Su Nuraxi - Barumini - Sardinia - Italy - 07.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Nuraghe Su Nuraxi - Barumini - Sardinia - Italy - 07.jpg, not featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Nov 2013 at 20:50:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info created by, uploaded by and nominated by -- Norbert Nagel (talk) 20:50, 7 November 2013 (UTC)
Support -- Norbert Nagel (talk) 20:50, 7 November 2013 (UTC)- Support Good, the resolution is really good and the detail as well, you can see perfectly the gravel and even yellow flowers among the rocks. This monument is truly spectacular, I visited a few years ago. to gape --Pava (talk) 22:17, 7 November 2013 (UTC)
- Support Nice and detailed view of an intereting site. I whish we had more megalithic FPCs :) --Myrabella (talk) 13:29, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
- Support JKadavoor Jee 16:37, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
- Support --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:30, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
- Support --Joydeep Talk 17:55, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
Oppose Quality Image? Yes. FP? Poor lighting condition and very unspectacular composition.Fotoriety (talk) 23:01, 8 November 2013 (UTC)- Support Here we are not in QI, photography makes sense because the site is exceptional. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:44, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
Comment -- Could you please respond more clearly because i don't quite follow what you've said.Fotoriety (talk) 23:00, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
- Support --JLPC (talk) 15:58, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
- Oppose Nice picture, but total lack of WOW.M49314 (talk) 17:02, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
- Support Michael Barera (talk) 04:12, 10 November 2013 (UTC)
- Oppose Nothing that catches the eye. I guess that a different point of view could have depicted the subject better. Barcex (talk) 09:22, 10 November 2013 (UTC)
- Oppose No Wow for me, sorry. Pleclown (talk) 10:51, 10 November 2013 (UTC)
- Oppose Light and composition are not very good in my eyes, and toghether put the image below FP quality imo despite excellent resolution. — Julian H.✈ (talk/files) 11:18, 10 November 2013 (UTC)
- Support Very good quality (the light could be better though) for an exceptional site. Very high (pre)historical and educational value.--Jebulon (talk) 15:03, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
- Oppose per Fotoriety --Vamps (talk) 18:27, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
- Oppose The lighting is not very good. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:01, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
- Oppose Nothing special. --Karelj (talk) 23:15, 16 November 2013 (UTC)
