Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Museo del Bicentenario - "Retrato de Juan Domingo Perón y Eva Duarte", Numa Ayrinhac.jpg

File:Museo del Bicentenario - "Retrato de Juan Domingo Perón y Eva Duarte", Numa Ayrinhac.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Dec 2012 at 14:37:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Museo del Bicentenario - "Retrato de Juan Domingo Perón y Eva Duarte", Numa Ayrinhac.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Museo del Bicentenario - "Retrato de Juan Domingo Perón y Eva Duarte", Numa Ayrinhac.jpg

•  Info created by Numa Ayrinhac - uploaded by B1mbo - nominated by Ezarate -- Ezarateesteban 14:37, 18 December 2012 (UTC)
•  Support -- Ezarateesteban 14:37, 18 December 2012 (UTC)
•  Oppose Rare and nice subject, interesting, very high encyclopedic and educational value. Unfortunately, I'm afraid the technical quality of the photograph is not good enough, especially sharpness.--Jebulon (talk) 11:23, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
•  Weak Support Isn't that great technically, but still worth FP status to me. Béria Lima ^msg 14:20, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
•  Weak support Per Beria: not great technically, but still probably worthy of FP status in my mind. Michael Barera (talk) 21:54, 23 December 2012 (UTC)
•  Support Worth picture. I didn't get one thing. It is stated "Date - circa 1920", and in the text "It was done in 1948". Does it mean that the image has been painting over 28 years?! --Ximeg (talk) 13:04, 25 December 2012 (UTC)
  •  InfoSomething is wrong somewhere, indeed. J.Perón was President of the Argentinian Nation for the first time since 1946 (he wears the presidential sash on the picture). He married Eva Duarte in 1945. Born in 1919, she died in 1952. So this painting, maybe made in 1948, represents a period between 1946 ( beginning of the first Perón's presidency), and 1952, (death of Evita). The date of 1920 is senseless. Don't cry for me Argentina.--Jebulon (talk) 23:03, 25 December 2012 (UTC)

I just fixed the info, thanks for the advise Ezarateesteban 23:27, 25 December 2012 (UTC)

•  Oppose Technical quality (especially sharpness) is not good. May be an apt candidate for VI Nomnations. --Dey.sandip (talk) 06:01, 26 December 2012 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 4 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Béria Lima ^msg 06:13, 28 December 2012 (UTC)