Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Musee d'Orsay and Pont Royal, North-West view 140402 1.jpg

File:Musee d'Orsay and Pont Royal, North-West view 140402 1.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Apr 2014 at 09:18:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Musee d'Orsay and Pont Royal, North-West view 140402 1.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Musee d'Orsay and Pont Royal, North-West view 140402 1.jpg

•  Info created by DXR - uploaded by DXR - nominated by Paris 16
•  Support Maybe too much "Paris in the morning panorama", but this one is better than the other-- Paris 16 (talk) 09:18, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
•  Support Superb. As already said: If the pano recurrs on the same raw material as the the other pano it would be appreciated to upload a higher resolution to additionaly increase the EV if it is possible for you. --Tuxyso (talk) 09:24, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
•  Support Even better than the other one. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 09:27, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
•  Support Yann (talk) 09:35, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
•  Comment Okay. Thanks Paris 16 for the nomination. I honestly hope you guys are not annoyed with my images crowding the space here, that wasn't my intention, of course. @Tuxyso: I have adjusted the size to 40MP, that footbridge from which I shot vibrates like hell and the faraway images are just too soft for any more resolution. Furthermore, I am not sure what the proper process is here? Should I withdraw the other one? Both images were shot seperately and are not based on the same material, and are certainly not alts in the strict sense. Could some more experienced users give their opinion, please? --DXR (talk) 10:24, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
  • DXR: Under that circumstances I would keep the photo as it is. I can fully follow your argument regarding bridge vibrating - it can be very annonying :( Thus good luck with this nom.
    Flooding with excellent photo is always welcome. IMHO it is a great apprecication of your work that other active Commons user nominate your photos. I look forward to further interesting DXR contributions and nominations :) --Tuxyso (talk) 11:27, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
    • I certainly appreciate it a lot, just was a bit surprising to me. But you are right, this probably has quite some wow. Well, I guess I'll just take a little nomination break after those images so that it evens out over time ;-). --DXR (talk) 19:27, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
•  Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 12:38, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
•  Support -- This is the better of the two. Saffron Blaze (talk) 15:39, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
•  Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 17:36, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
•  Support—Love, Kelvinsong talk 01:40, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
•  Support Jee 03:16, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
•  Support ...and again! ;-) --mathias K 06:31, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
•  Comment I have decided to withdraw the other image due to the redundancy and also due to technical issues, thanks for your support. --DXR (talk) 11:14, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
•  Support better than the other one --Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 13:07, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
•  Support --P e z i (talk) 14:32, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
•  Support — Julian H.^✈(talk/files) 16:22, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
•  Support Much better than the two previous noimnations. --(✉→Arctic Kangaroo←✎) 17:48, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
•  Support Kruusamägi (talk) 21:36, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
•  Support--JLPC (talk) 07:33, 5 April 2014 (UTC)
•  Support Good work! Poco² 09:18, 5 April 2014 (UTC)
•  Support--ArildV (talk) 09:32, 5 April 2014 (UTC)
•  Support Michael Barera (talk) 01:55, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
•  SupportVery Nice! Danielåhskarlsson (talk) 11:53, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
•  Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 20:17, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
•  Support Trés painterly. Daniel Case (talk) 17:59, 7 April 2014 (UTC)
•  Support --Baresi F (talk) 20:44, 7 April 2014 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 23 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Jee 16:20, 8 April 2014 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Panoramas