Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Mount Rushmore detail view.jpg

File:Mount Rushmore detail view.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 May 2020 at 20:41:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Mount Rushmore detail view.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Mount Rushmore detail view.jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Statues outdoors
•  Info Please notice that the image cannot be displayed regularly in the browser due to the high resolution of 612 megapixels. However, the image can be downloaded or viewed in the ZoomViewer. There is also a reduced version with only 100 megapixels, which can be viewed in the browser as usual. Created, uploaded and nominated by me -- Wolf im Wald 20:41, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Wolf im Wald 20:41, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
•  Support I don't know about the technology, but the result seems pretty incredible. Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:55, 11 May 2020 (UTC)

•  Info Thank you! It's a stitched image out of 187 single images. I took them with a focal length of 600mm (prime lens) on my Canon EOS 5DS (full frame). The stitched image has a full resolution of 1448 megapixels, but I had to scale it down for computer performance reasons and because of the 30.000 x 30.000 pixels limitation of the JPEG format. Because of the extreme conditions (heated air flow) not every single image is perfectly sharp, so that I besides improved the overall sharpness with this downscaling. -- Wolf im Wald 01:03, 12 May 2020 (UTC)

•  Support Amazing! --Sonya7iv (talk) 21:21, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
•  Strong support Utterly incredible. Cmao20 (talk) 22:33, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Unbelievable quality. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:00, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
•  Support per others. Stupefying! -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:29, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 03:24, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Nice composition, outstanding resolution -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:43, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 05:22, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- B2Belgium (talk) 08:24, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:57, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Cayambe (talk) 09:57, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Definitly great ;–). --Aristeas (talk) 10:01, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Very nice big mosaic. And even good framing and light on top. - Benh (talk) 11:17, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:20, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Fischer.H (talk) 17:14, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Seven Pandas (talk) 20:03, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --XRay ^talk 05:06, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 07:11, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Ermell (talk) 08:55, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Definitely one of the very best images on Commons. POTY candidate 2020.--Peulle (talk) 10:28, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Poco a poco (talk) 20:31, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Die Auflösung ist abartig. Ich liebe es! --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 14:39, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Absolutely flawless. --Palauenc05 (talk) 15:56, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
•  Support--Dinkum (talk) 17:06, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Daniel Case (talk) 02:19, 15 May 2020 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 26 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 16:36, 17 May 2020 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Sculptures#Statues outdoors