Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Moscas. Fecundación. Bastavales, Brión, 090905.jpg

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

File:Moscas. Fecundación. Bastavales, Brión, 090905.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Sep 2010 at 19:38:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Copula of Musca domestica. Bastavales, Brión, Galicia, Spain

Other version[edit]

 Comment If your image it's better, why don't you propose your image to QI? Perhaps do you compare flies with red eyes with the flies with black or dark eyes? What you compare, please? Images shoild be reviewed on basis of their merit alone, not in comparison with others: I know that my image is not the best possible one--Luis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez (talk) 14:02, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Both images show the same species of fly. What I intended to show was that your image is not properly lit since the colours don't come out all that well. --Muhammad (talk)`
I can't say this in english:
Español: Sin embargo, los ojos de cualquier ciudadano de Galicia (Spain) asegurarían que tu foto está sobresaturada y falseada, y que la mía es real. Quizás no sean los ojos de todas las moscas iguales, cosa que ya sé de antemano, pues las moscas domésticas de Galicia tienen los ojos practicamente negros. Por favor, diga algo sobre la foto que no esté basado en si el díptero es de una manera o de otra, o en la comparación con su foto o su experiencia en el objeto de la foto. (por otro lado, su foto, si los ojos de las moscas en su mundo son así, me parece excelente)
--Luis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez (talk) 14:56, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Translation:However, any Galician citizens would assert that your photo is over saturated, falsificated whereas mine is not. Maybe not every flies' eyes are equal, something that I know, as Galician flies have their eyes almost black. Please, you should not say something about the photo on the basis of the appearance of the dipterous, the comparation of your image or your experience on the photographed object. (If the flies in your part of the world look this way, then that's excellent for me)

Most flies have reddish eyes and all houseflies have red eyes. See this, this and this. The eyes in my image are not over saturated. The fact that your fly is sitting on a white surface has led it to be improperly exposed. It is not a bad picture but IMO it is not enough for FP --Muhammad (talk) 15:36, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
OK. You won!--Luis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez (talk) 21:43, 6 September 2010 (UTC) I don't know why your words (Both images show the same species of fly. What I intended to show was that your image is not properly lit since the colours don't come out all that well.) are without hour and date. I think that you know the reason--Luis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez (talk) 21:57, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment I can't say this in english:

Español: Tras haber hecho esta segunda propuesta, me he puesto en contacto con todos los que habían participado en la discusión. Me he puesto en contacto con ellos para decirles que había una segunda propuesta porque lo considero ético: Han votado, luego si hay cambios deben saber de ellos. Yo no pretendo influír, mediatizar ni transtocar el voto de nadie, pero puedo informar para que voten con más conocimiento y libremente

--Luis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez (talk) 14:33, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Translation:After this second proposal I have got in contact with all of the participants in this debate to inform them about it, not because I want to influence or interfere with somebody's vote, just because I think it's ethical as they have voted.

Confirmed results:
Result: 6 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 20:00, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]