Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Monaco Panorama 2015.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Monaco Panorama 2015.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 May 2015 at 06:45:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Panoramas
- Info all by Villy Fink Isaksen -- Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 06:45, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
- Support -- Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 06:45, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
- Support Great panorama with many, many details. --Tremonist (talk) 12:09, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
- Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 13:02, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
- Support Yann (talk) 13:19, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
- Support --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:25, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
- Support --Böhringer (talk) 06:31, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
- Comment Nice panorama though the colors look faded. --Laitche (talk) 07:28, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
- I agree, I think there might be some problems with the processing. There is some inconsistency in the sky. I'm guessing that tone mapping or exposure fusion was used, the dull muddy sky is a common problem with that technique. Diliff (talk) 10:01, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
Oppose for now, although I could be persuaded to support if reprocessed to fix the issues with the sky. The whole scene looks slightly too dark too. I appreciate that it might have been to preserve highlight detail, but a bit of bumping up shadow and mids might be useful. Diliff (talk) 10:01, 24 April 2015 (UTC)- Comment I am working on it but it is a hard job, please wait a few days. --Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 21:47, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
- Support --LuisArmandoRasteletti (talk) 11:02, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
- Done Uploaded a better version with more light in the dark areas. And the sky is also better now. --Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 19:24, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
- Support. Improved. I still think the right side of the sky is a bit dull and not very blue and the transitions between the frames is not great (you can clearly see a difference in brightness), but the left side is improved. Overall, it's just good enough for a support, but if you still have some energy to improve the sky on the right, it would be another step in the right direction. Did you make sure that each frame had the same exposure and the same white balance? It seems like something isn't quite right. Diliff (talk) 21:37, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
- Comment It's a tiny thing but a stitching error, added an image note. If you'd like to remove that, please do so. --Laitche (talk) 10:38, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
- Done I have uploaded a panorama with less stitching error, but this has moved to another place in the picture but harder to see. Thanks for all the reviews. The panorama is from 7 picture taken on vacation in southern France, and I was not prepared to take panoramas, so the seven picture are taken with f/11 but with different shutter time from 1/320 to 1/160 that leads to problems. And the boats have moved a bit between the shots and that leads to stitching errors. THX all. --Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 13:38, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
- Comment Sorry, but I have uploaded the wrong version twice - but now it looks like the right one. - SORRY. --Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 17:04, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
- Neutral Much better but still the colors are a bit faded and gradually changing a part by a part. --Laitche (talk) 22:00, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
- Support -- Pofka (talk) 14:12, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Panoramas