Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Megyeri híd.jpg

File:Megyeri híd.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Feb 2011 at 00:57:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Megyeri híd.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Megyeri híd.jpg

•  Info created by Samat - uploaded by Samat - nominated by Snaevar -- Snaevar (talk) 00:57, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
•  Abstain as nominator -- Snaevar (talk) 00:57, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
•  Support --The High Fin Sperm Whale 01:31, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
•  Support Couple blown highlights, but positively fantastic composition and color. Great work. Steven Walling 06:52, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose Excellent technical quality I think, but I really don't like the composition, too much centred in my opinion. --Eusebius (talk) 10:07, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose distorted ad nauseam --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 13:58, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
•  Info Those lamposts are designed to be inclined towards the road, i.e. not in 90 degree angle with the road (more details here). Also, I´d like to point out that this bridge is a 2x2 + layby lane bridge, seperated by a slight gap in the middle.--Snaevar (talk) 15:27, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
•  Support Despite the distortion -- MJJR (talk) 17:54, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
•  Support Beautiful -- IdLoveOne (talk) 20:01, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
•  Support ditto –hoverFly | chat? 01:50, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
•  Support just beautiful! --MotherForker (talk) 13:31, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
•  Support Love it! --Admrboltz (talk) 03:13, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per others above--Miguel Bugallo 07:49, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
•  Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 12:39, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
•  Support Beautiful! TFCforever (talk) 18:16, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
•  Support -- MartinD (talk) 10:03, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
•  Support --Cephas (talk) 19:53, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
•  Support technical not perfect, but good and very good architectual view --Wladyslaw (talk) 15:18, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose no specific reason ... GerardM (talk) 01:33, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose The picture gives no idea how this bridge really looks. --Berthold Werner (talk) 09:11, 1 February 2011 (UTC)

• Ich weiß ja nicht, was du siehst, aber ich sehe eine Schrägseilbrücke mit zwei Pylonen. Komisch, dass ich das sehe, obwohl das Bild laut dir keinen Eindrucken vermittelt, wie die Brücke wirklich aussieht. --Wladyslaw (talk) 10:04, 1 February 2011 (UTC)

•  Support --SHION (talk) 13:05, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Account age too young, and number of edits too low.--Snaevar (talk) 13:30, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose I agree with Eusebius, bad composition.--Claus (talk) 14:41, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Support --Brackenheim (talk) 20:21, 2 February 2011 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 13 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 09:49, 4 February 2011 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture