Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Madeleine Paris.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Madeleine Paris.jpg, not featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Nov 2013 at 20:20:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Info All by me -- Jebulon (talk) 20:20, 28 October 2013 (UTC)
- Support View of the church "La Madeleine" in Paris, France.-- Jebulon (talk) 20:20, 28 October 2013 (UTC)
- Support A bit grainy? Maybe. Overprocessed and oversharpened? Possibly. But I'm still wowed. Seriously. --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 20:47, 28 October 2013 (UTC)
- Oppose Too very bad cut.... and quality (from the sensor/exposure) is not suitable for Featured picture for me. Also (but this is personal) I find the subject uninteresting, it's a fake play very tacky. But the main reason is the bad angle and, above all, the cut of the picture, to me impossible for a Featured picture --Pava (talk) 23:30, 28 October 2013 (UTC)
- To me, the angle and the cut are particularly excellent for this building, and I don't understand it's a fake play very tacky.--Jebulon (talk) 09:38, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
- Comment Imho it's oversharpened. --Ivar (talk) 08:02, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
- Oppose now. --Ivar (talk) 13:14, 2 November 2013 (UTC)
- Oppose Your edit with GIMP has made it worse (oversharpened, too much contrast). There is some CA too, so a more professional image converter software would probably do a better job with this. But the scaffolding in the building is a negative and the lighting is fairly hard. -- Colin (talk) 09:10, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
- Support --JLPC (talk) 08:07, 2 November 2013 (UTC)
- Support Michael Barera (talk) 00:14, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
- Support Despite a few minor issues (bottom crop, hard light), good enough for FP. --Selbymay (talk) 10:03, 5 November 2013 (UTC)
- Thank you very much to all reviewers, pro and contra. Frankly, I think this does not deserve the label. It is an old picture for me (2011), and I think I can do better now. It was just an attempt, and a way for me to "test" this image. --Jebulon (talk) 08:38, 7 November 2013 (UTC)