Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:MK 30955-71 Kloster Eberbach Dachstuhl.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:MK 30955-71 Kloster Eberbach Dachstuhl.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Nov 2016 at 04:55:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors
- Info Roof trusses of the Library Hall, Monastery Eberbach. To be viewed in the 360° panorama viewer! Created and uploaded by Martin Kraft - nominated by me --Code (talk) 04:55, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
- Support I very much like this panorama as it shows a completely different motif in a very interesting way. The quality is very high as well and it's a WLM 2016 winner in Germany. -- Code (talk) 04:55, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
- Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:59, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
- Support lNeverCry 05:03, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
- Support Very interesting view, this is a great subject for a 360° panorama. The infamous "Canon banding" in the shadows is unfortunate but the overall quality is still excellent. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:16, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
- @King of Hearts: After some years of experience with Canon sensors I have to admit that the shadow highlighting is indeed an issue. If I'd start again from the scratch with digital photography maybe I'd choose Sony or Nikon instead of Canon. However, Canon's lenses are rather excellent IMO. --Code (talk) 05:32, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
- Indeed, the old adage was "Nikon makes better lenses, Canon makes better bodies," but since 2010 it's pretty much been the reverse. Nikon still has no standard zoom that can take advantage of the D800E sensor as well as the 24-70 II can take advantage of the 5DS R sensor (the 24-70 I was worse than Nikon's), its venerable 14-24 has been beaten at its own game by the 11-24, and Canon of course has a larger selection of telephotos. Nikon's one advantage is its huge catalog of manual-focus lenses which cost less than $200 apiece and are still sharper than a modern zoom. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:58, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
- @King of Hearts: After some years of experience with Canon sensors I have to admit that the shadow highlighting is indeed an issue. If I'd start again from the scratch with digital photography maybe I'd choose Sony or Nikon instead of Canon. However, Canon's lenses are rather excellent IMO. --Code (talk) 05:32, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
- Support great! --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:03, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
- Neutral Sorry, I would prefer a centered view. Technically it is perfect, no doubt, but otherwise the subject gives no wow to me. -- -donald- (talk) 07:47, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
- @-donald-: I get your point and (as you an see here or there) I usually prefer centered compositions in panoramas. But in this case I tried some centered view points and noticed that this leads to a strange alignement of the frame structure, which (a) would make the image a bit boring and (b) emphasis every asymmetry the building has. And since this timber frame structure is some hundred years old, it is far from being straight. Therefore I decided that an off-center view-point would be the better solution in this case. // Martin K. (talk) 08:30, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
- Support Äntligen! :) (for non-Swedes see the 12.50pm 'At last!' part)--cart-Talk 09:59, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
- Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 10:35, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
- Support --The Photographer 15:15, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
- Support --Cayambe (talk) 15:44, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
- Support I'm dizzy... --Godot13 (talk) 19:29, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
- Support I'm glad that I had the opportunity to learn how this was created ; -) Thanks, Martin! --AWeith (talk) 21:19, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
- Support Looks pretty interesting even in normal view. Daniel Case (talk) 04:50, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
- Support --Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:47, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
- Support What a great panorama. --★ Poké95 09:03, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
- Support --Hockei (talk) 12:36, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
- Support Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:36, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
- Support -- Zcebeci (talk) 15:48, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
- Support good work! --Alchemist-hp (talk) 23:18, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
- Support --Ralf Roleček 01:04, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors