Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Lukmanierpass, Passo del Lucomagno. 20-09-2022. (actm.) 06.jpg

File:Lukmanierpass, Passo del Lucomagno. 20-09-2022. (actm.) 06.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Jul 2023 at 04:24:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Lukmanierpass, Passo del Lucomagno. 20-09-2022. (actm.) 06.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Lukmanierpass, Passo del Lucomagno. 20-09-2022. (actm.) 06.jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Settlements#Switzerland
•  Info Lukmanierpas Passo del Lucomagno. (Detail of the shelter near the pass overgrown with Xanthoria parietina.)
  All by -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:24, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
•  Support -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:24, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
•  Support Love the colour contrast. --SHB2000 (talk) 08:57, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
•  Oppose Common image, no reason for FP nomination, IHMO. -- Karelj (talk) 21:42, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
•  Support Again one of those images that could almost be an abstract artwork, but show interesting details of the world around us. In this case I love to see such detail of the fungi - not sure it shouldn't go to the page of fungi, if featured. --Kritzolina (talk) 18:59, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
•  Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:52, 25 June 2023 (UTC)
•  Support Good pars pro toto of a impressive dry-stone wall with interesting flora. --Aristeas (talk) 06:55, 25 June 2023 (UTC)
•  Question What's causing the artifacts (little black and/or white spots that don't seem to be part of the texture of the stone) all around the image, especially in the bottom corners? BigDom (talk) 13:14, 25 June 2023 (UTC)

• Answer: That is weathering on the stones that lie deeper and receive less sunlight. I made the weathering a little less dominant.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:30, 25 June 2023 (UTC)

•  Support per Aristeas. -- Radomianin (talk) 18:14, 25 June 2023 (UTC)
•  Oppose I really like this color of lichen, but I am just not captivated by this composition, after giving it a chance for a few days. I prefer the source image of the whole mountain hut, although the sun was a bit strong when it was shot, so I don't think it's an FP, either. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:02, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
•  Support --XRay 💬 17:56, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
•  Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 23:40, 27 June 2023 (UTC)
•  Oppose I love the idea of this image, but ... the lichens look a little misprocessed in places, some of the highlights could be toned down a bit, and the artifacts BigDom noticed at bottom center cannot be the weathering on the stones as they overlay the lichens also and do not exhibit the same variation in focus as the stones they are supposed to be on. Daniel Case (talk) 19:06, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
•  Oppose I agree with Ikan Kekek, sorry, Poco a poco (talk) 19:52, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
•  Oppose Sorry, would have supported otherwise, but looks overprocessed. In the center of lower left quarter of the image there are visible artifacts, and through supersaturation some details of the lichen seem to have been burned out. --Micha (talk) 23:05, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
•  Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 19:38, 29 June 2023 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--SHB2000 (talk) 09:11, 2 July 2023 (UTC)