Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Leuchtturm in Westerheversand.jpg

File:Leuchtturm in Westerheversand.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Feb 2016 at 05:01:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Leuchtturm in Westerheversand.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Leuchtturm in Westerheversand.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
•  Info created by Phantom3Pix - uploaded by Phantom3Pix - nominated by Pine -- Pine^✉ 05:01, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
•  Support -- Pine^✉ 05:01, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:36, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
• Very good, but  Oppose in favor of the cropped version. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:50, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
•  strong support a fantastic view! --Alchemist-hp (talk) 13:07, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --Johann Jaritz (talk) 05:45, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
•  Support The image quality is not as good as we would usually expect it from an FP candidate, but the WOW effect and the educational value are definitely overwhelming here. --Code (talk) 18:37, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
•  Support Drone picture ? --The Photographer (talk) 02:13, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
•  Support - Owain Knight (talk) 18:36, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
•  Support -- -donald- (talk) 11:12, 11 February 2016 (UTC)

Alternative

•  Info I prefer without people and i crop the white part on the right --LivioAndronico ^(talk) 08:19, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --LivioAndronico ^(talk) 08:19, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
•  Support - I prefer this version, though I also would have been willing to support the original if not faced with this choice. The composition is beautiful and I love the clouds, which remind me of Dutch landscape paintings. I'm somewhat bothered by noise in the background, but perhaps that's from the exhaust from the plane or something, and anyway, I can't see it except at full size, so I'm tolerating it, given the overall beauty of the picture. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:49, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
•  Support I'm more bothered by the CA than the noise, but it's a good enough picture that for me, the wow and EV override the technical defects. -- Thennicke (talk) 09:10, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
•  Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 12:38, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose prefer the original with the people as a scale. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 13:09, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
•  Support This is a little tighter and I like it better. Daniel Case (talk) 16:45, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 17:52, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
•  Support Better. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:04, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --Johann Jaritz (talk) 05:45, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --Hubertl 09:44, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --Famberhorst (talk) 18:30, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
•  Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 09:40, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --Llez (talk) 16:58, 11 February 2016 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 10:12, 14 February 2016 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture

The chosen alternative is: File:Leuchtturm in Westerheversand crop.jpg