Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Leosvel et Diosmani - 4.jpg

File:Leosvel et Diosmani - 4.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Nov 2011 at 18:34:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Leosvel et Diosmani - 4.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Leosvel et Diosmani - 4.jpg

•  Info created by Ludo - uploaded by Ludo - nominated by Ludo. I made this photo during a cycle race in Grenoble velodrome. I've removed few artefacts, one light and ropes. You can see, the first one here. -- Ludo (talk) 18:34, 15 November 2011 (UTC)
•  Support -- Ludo (talk) 18:34, 15 November 2011 (UTC)
•  Support -- Lots of wow, image quality as good as possible. I would cropp slightly at bottom. Alvesgaspar (talk) 19:08, 15 November 2011 (UTC)
•  Support \includepackage{Alvesgaspar}, plus we need to encourage beautiful action photographs, as they are especially difficult to produce. -- Rama (talk) 19:19, 15 November 2011 (UTC)
•  Support Maybe per Alves for the crop suggestion though. - Benh (talk) 19:30, 15 November 2011 (UTC)
•  Support Definitely --Paolo Costa (talk) 19:42, 15 November 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose until CA are removed and the background got cleaned. regards, PETER WEIS TALK 19:48, 15 November 2011 (UTC)
•  Comment Please add a reference to the original on the file page using the {{Retouched}} template. --Slaunger (talk) 20:11, 15 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Thanks, you are fast! --Slaunger (talk) 20:32, 15 November 2011 (UTC)
•  Support Huge wow mitigates lots of noise due to ISO800. But given the lightning conditions, you probably did not have any other options - except perhaps a slightly longer exposure time, but that is hard to fiddle with, when the action is happening, and it would be at the risk of introducing motion blur. So all, in all I think it is OK with the ISO. The light is very good at highlighting the muscles, veines and expression of concentration of the performaing artists. Impressive and good composition - if only the pole had been on the other side of the leg it would have been perfect. --Slaunger (talk) 20:25, 15 November 2011 (UTC)

Thanks. For ISO, the place was very dark. Before this performing, I was at ISO 3200 for the cycling race. For these guys, there is more direct light. So I reduce ISO. But artists moved, so I must keep a good speed. 1/640s, I think it's good for this action shoot. Ludo (talk) 20:36, 15 November 2011 (UTC)

Agreed. Seems like a very reasonable judgement. --Slaunger (talk) 20:52, 15 November 2011 (UTC)

•  Support Of course. Kyro (talk) 22:04, 15 November 2011 (UTC)
•  Support —Bruce1ee^talk 05:04, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose Too noisy FMT. พ.s. 07:53, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
•  Support --Mbdortmund (talk) 00:34, 17 November 2011 (UTC)
•  Info &  Support A bit noisy, but given the lighting conditions it is acceptable. I was not satisfied with the cloning job so I reworked from the original and uploaded a new version. --Jovian Eye _storm 03:34, 17 November 2011 (UTC)
•  Support Wow effect! PierreSelim (talk) 14:28, 17 November 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose. Enlever la lumière et les câblages enlève de l'information. Belle photo autrement. Thierry Caro (talk) 11:11, 19 November 2011 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 18:13, 26 November 2011 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Sports