Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Lava-espanola-male.jpg

File:Lava-espanola-male.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Jan 2012 at 01:30:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Lava-espanola-male.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Lava-espanola-male.jpg

•  Info created by Benjamint444 - uploaded by Benjamint444 - nominated by David C. S. -- David C. S. 01:30, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
•  Strong support -- David C. S. 01:30, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
•  Support - the resolution is really borderline for a featured picture candidate, but there is high EV, attractive composition and reasonable technical quality, so I'm willing to support. --Claritas (talk) 14:20, 24 December 2011 (UTC)

  1.8 megapixels is a borderline?--Mbz1 (talk) 16:45, 24 December 2011 (UTC)

  • In my opinion, yes. I'm really not willing to support anything under that, but there's no absolute rule that all FPs have to be above 2Mpx.--Claritas (talk) 16:54, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose Too small.--Jebulon (talk) 15:35, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose Too small. As Jebulon--Miguel Bugallo 20:36, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
•  Support Size is close enough, and the image is very nice. InverseHypercube 07:33, 27 December 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose Too small --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 11:09, 28 December 2011 (UTC)
•  Support Nice image. –ElmA (Talk – My files) 13:59, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose a bit "too small", but also missing the EXIF data and a GEO tag. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 15:08, 1 January 2012 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 4 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Claritas (talk) 10:56, 2 January 2012 (UTC)