Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Kreta - Panorama Rethymno.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Kreta - Panorama Rethymno.jpg, not featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Aug 2016 at 08:53:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places#Greece
Info all by Wladyslaw -- Wladyslaw (talk) 08:53, 13 August 2016 (UTC)
Support -- Wladyslaw (talk) 08:53, 13 August 2016 (UTC)
Comment underexposed, but that's fixable... --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 11:14, 14 August 2016 (UTC)
- Support my screen is correctly calibrated - and the second version appears way more vivid now. --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:19, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
- Support Come on, guys... Did you open it ? The image does not make justice to the wonderful and delicate egyptian lighthouse, a landmark of the city, but I think that this panorama deserves some support votes, due to excellent details level, and choice of point of view.--Jebulon (talk) 18:00, 14 August 2016 (UTC)
Oppose A QI for sure (although a bit underexposed), by, IMHO, not striking enough. Nothing draws my attention. Fortezza (the castle) is quite off the third's position. --C messier (talk) 18:33, 14 August 2016 (UTC)- Oppose Per C messier. Looks a bit over-sharpened too. INeverCry 22:45, 14 August 2016 (UTC)
- Info I guess many of the used panels aren't correct adjusted or calibrated. But nevertheless I have brightened the image a bit up. The sharpening process isn't different to my other panos and I can't detect any oversharpend area. This image shows the typical greek urban settlement and the Bay of Almirou . I find this view encyclopedic very valuable and nice, but for sure no everybody has the same opinion. --Wladyslaw (talk) 05:50, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
- Support Per Jebulon ... if there were problems, they appear to have been corrected. Daniel Case (talk) 06:02, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
- Support -- Spurzem (talk) 19:43, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose - I love the light, but I regret to say that this is not an FP composition to me. The foreground includes some kind of garbage dump on the left and cut-off not very interesting buildings on the right. I might reconsider if you crop out most of the foreground. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:52, 18 August 2016 (UTC)
- Ikan Kekek: Cutting this pano would mean that the image would become a less good proportion. What is "very interesting" on the flats on the right that I shouldn't have cut them off? The architecture is very similar to many others we see in the image. Real garbage we don't see, it`s more a kind of relict of former hovels. Can't find that this is disturbative, this belongs to the culture of Greece. I have endeavored that this parts are not dominating the image and I guess this was successful. --Wladyslaw (talk) 20:14, 18 August 2016 (UTC)
- Comment - Your nomination might be successful, but to me the issue isn't only that the buildings in the near right corner aren't per se very interesting to me to be so emphasized, but that they are arbitrarily cropped in a way that I found disturbing. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:49, 19 August 2016 (UTC)
- Ikan Kekek: Cutting this pano would mean that the image would become a less good proportion. What is "very interesting" on the flats on the right that I shouldn't have cut them off? The architecture is very similar to many others we see in the image. Real garbage we don't see, it`s more a kind of relict of former hovels. Can't find that this is disturbative, this belongs to the culture of Greece. I have endeavored that this parts are not dominating the image and I guess this was successful. --Wladyslaw (talk) 20:14, 18 August 2016 (UTC)
- Support --Dэя-Бøяg 19:15, 18 August 2016 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 6 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /INeverCry 19:07, 22 August 2016 (UTC)
