Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Kreta - Bergpanorama am Potamon-Stausee.jpg

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

File:Kreta - Bergpanorama am Potamon-Stausee.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Aug 2016 at 05:55:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Crete: Mountains of Crete with Potamon barrier lake


Discussion on sharpness handling
:Sorry, but you can't have a sharp foreground if you want to have a sharp background. This is how optic works. Beside of this I wonder what is so important about some bushes and it's a very small unsharp and not disturbing area. --Wladyslaw (talk) 06:11, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Also sorry, but you are wrong. A focus stack from 2-3 images and your image will be complete sharp. Otherwise you can cut the right side or take images with less unsharp foreground. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 06:36, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
A focus stack in non-studio-condition is nonsense. Beside of this the image atmosphere is with this part better than without. --Wladyslaw (talk) 06:46, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Nonsense are only your arguments ... but I don't say your image is bad! --Alchemist-hp (talk) 10:27, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Focus stacking without tripod is nonsense, no need to discuss this out. Beside of this I see no need and no improvement for this image to make here focus stacking. A landscape image is not a still life. --Wladyslaw (talk) 18:55, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Natürlich muß man beim Focus Stacking ein Stativ nutzen und natürlich ist es kein Problem es bei Landschaftsaufnahmen wie dieser hier anzuwenden. Wie auf diesem Bild bewegt sich da kaum etwas. Aber jede Diskussion mit Dir artet doch nur in mühseligen Wortspielereien aus. Ich sagte nicht das Du es hättest machen sollen oder gar müssen, ich wollte nur sagen das es möglich wäre! Daher gebe ich es auf, es hat eh keinen Sinn. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 05:05, 28 July 2016 (UTC) P.S.: auf dem Bild vermisse ich trotzdem den Stausee ;-)[reply]
We've seen plenty of great panoramas here that aren't drastically unsharp in the foreground. It's one thing to have reasonable blurring in the distance, but if you want to argue that this should be a Featured Picture because that's what your lens took, I'm sorry, but that's a weak argument. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:57, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
A weak argument IMO is your's. The unsharp area is very little and it does not affect the perception. Next time I downscale the image at 2560 x 976 and you'll not have this problem. Cheers! --Wladyslaw (talk) 08:04, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Again, big panoramas that we've featured have not been drastically unsharp in the foreground. This is Featured Picture Candidates. The other picture you nominated is fine. To me, this one is not for a Featured Picture. Others may disagree (and one already has). Good luck. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:46, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I'll fix both this evening. --Wladyslaw (talk) 08:19, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Kreuzschnabel: fixed now. But why does Commons rotate my picture???--Wladyslaw (talk) 05:47, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Commons behaves a bit strange recently. I tried to rotate the image but it’s still upright. Let’s wait a few hours. --Kreuzschnabel 06:49, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 4 support, 1 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /INeverCry 20:09, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Featured_picture_candidates/File:Kreta_-_Bergpanorama_am_Potamon-Stausee.jpg&oldid=203225137"