Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Koenigssee - St. Bartholomew's Church 02.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Koenigssee - St. Bartholomew's Church 02.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Jun 2016 at 14:35:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings
Info St. Bartholomä in south-eastern Bavaria is an iconic church on the western shore of Lake Königssee within Berchtesgaden National Park and can only be reached by boat. It is an extremely popular tourist attraction as it offers a fine example of rural southern German Baroque architecture picturesquely situated close to the foot of Mount Watzmann's massive East Face. All by me, --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 14:35, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 14:35, 30 May 2016 (UTC)- Support --LivioAndronico (talk) 18:39, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
- strong support Could be a little sharper maybe, but ... WOOOOOOoooooooowwwwww. Daniel Case (talk) 19:02, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
- Support WOOOOOOHOOOOOOW! 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 21:09, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
Neutral a bit overexposed for my tatse. Can you try to rework it? --Alchemist-hp (talk) 22:54, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
- I'm not sure the image is really overexposed - I guess that's an effect caused by the polarizer I used. There's always drawbacks with polarizers, but in this case I was glad to have it attached as lighting started to become difficult. --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 04:00, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
- Please take a look to the white of the towers = blown-out lights for me. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 06:48, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
Done Alchemist-hp, I've uploaded a new, very moderately reworked version that hopes to successfully address a couple of minor issues - I've also tried to reduce highlights a bit. --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 19:50, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
- Please take a look to the white of the towers = blown-out lights for me. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 06:48, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
- I'm not sure the image is really overexposed - I guess that's an effect caused by the polarizer I used. There's always drawbacks with polarizers, but in this case I was glad to have it attached as lighting started to become difficult. --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 04:00, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
- Support - To me, this is excellent. Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:50, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
- Support -- Thennicke (talk) 05:34, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
- Support Good description also. -- -donald- (talk) 05:42, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
- Support INeverCry 18:24, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
- Support -- Jiel (talk) 21:25, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
- Support --Code (talk) 05:14, 1 June 2016 (UTC)
- Support --Pudelek (talk) 13:10, 1 June 2016 (UTC)
- Support Classic! --Milseburg (talk) 19:59, 1 June 2016 (UTC)
- Support --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 22:55, 1 June 2016 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:04, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
- Support --Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 07:11, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
- Moderate Support -- Nice scenery once again, but you should focus the picture more onto the topic (The Church), instead of it's surroundings. Target360YT (talk) 14:39, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 16 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 05:29, 5 June 2016 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings
