Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Kentrosaurus aethiopicus 01.jpg

File:Kentrosaurus aethiopicus 01.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Jan 2012 at 07:32:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Kentrosaurus aethiopicus 01.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Kentrosaurus aethiopicus 01.jpg

•  Info created by Llez - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 07:32, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
  

The depicted skeleton is unique worldwide. For detailed information see [1] and [2]

•  Support -- Llez (talk) 07:32, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
•  Support -- The subject is good, the bones are extremely detailed and clear. TrebleSeven (talk) 11:15, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
•  Neutral -- Good enough technically but I would prefer another angle so that the head of the beast weren't in the back. Alvesgaspar (talk) 11:29, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
  •  Comment It is a mounted Museum specimen and unfortunately it was not possible to take a similar photo from the other side (I tried it). --Llez (talk) 12:29, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
•  Neutral Great EV. Good background job. These kind of works make the wikipedia awesome. But for FP, I am disappointed about sharpness, and I'm not a sharpness freak. I will certainly support a more sharpened version, if possible to get. --Paolo Costa (talk) 14:06, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
•  Support --Katarighe (talk) 18:03, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
•  Support --Böhringer (talk) 23:21, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
•  Neutral for the moment. In my opinion, there is too much space under the feet, the beast seems "floating". Maybe it could be better with less black at the bottom. + The sharpness is not optimum...--Jebulon (talk) 13:42, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
  •  Comment Bottom cropped. --Llez (talk) 14:31, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
    •  Support after crop, The (relative) unsharpness is not a big issue, and is mitigated by the high EV of this rare skeleton.--Jebulon (talk) 18:57, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
•  Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 16:31, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
•  Support--Miguel Bugallo 22:35, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
•  Support This is one of those pictures that took a lot of time to take.Trongphu (talk) 00:12, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
•  Support --Cayambe (talk) 08:23, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
•  Support beautiful, interesting, detailed and well executed in my opinion - Benh (talk) 20:11, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
•  Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:49, 17 January 2012 (UTC)
•  Support --Brackenheim (talk) 22:44, 17 January 2012 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 2 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 18:10, 19 January 2012 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects