Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Karrenseilbahn Bergstation-Restaurant Dornbirn 1.JPG

File:Karrenseilbahn Bergstation-Restaurant Dornbirn 1.JPG, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Jun 2015 at 06:18:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Karrenseilbahn Bergstation-Restaurant Dornbirn 1.JPG Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Karrenseilbahn Bergstation-Restaurant Dornbirn 1.JPG

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes
•  Info Cable-car: Karrenseilbahn in Dornbirn, Austria. Restaurant in the mountain station. c/u/n by -- Böhringer (talk) 06:18, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Support -- Böhringer (talk) 06:18, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Neutral Nice blue hour lighting and very detailed. However, I find the composition a bit unsettling; the dining room is cropped at an awkward place at the top right, and as for the fence below, I feel like it should serve more of a compositional purpose or should be omitted altogether. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:33, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Thank you, you're right, but without a fence, the restaurant would be too much press. Thus, the image has a frame and acts more balanced. --Böhringer (talk) 08:48, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Support totally works for me --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:42, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Strong support Totally per Martin Falbisoner. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 08:48, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Yann (talk) 09:08, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Dark but pleasantly looking. -- Pofka (talk) 09:46, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Support My critical comment: the bottom of the restaurant is almost in line with the horizon. --Uoaei1 (talk) 10:35, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
• {o} Sorry to disagree about the fence. I find it too disturbing, and not helping to the composition at all. A no go for me, I'm afraid--Jebulon (talk) 11:09, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Support After thinking again, and re-review, I have to change my vote, my first review was not careful enough. I support now. "Il n'y a que les imbéciles qui ne changent pas d'avis".--Jebulon (talk) 11:24, 27 May 2015 (UTC)

@Jebulon: You removed others votes... --Laitche (talk) 11:56, 27 May 2015 (UTC)

•  Support Its something original, good IQ, but compo could be better, without the fence. --Mile (talk) 12:30, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Tremonist (talk) 13:10, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Support I don't think the fence is disturbing the pictures composition at all. Also I can follow Böhringer's explanation regarding this topic above. --Plani (talk) 13:40, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Neutral Nice creative photo but agree with negative opinions of the fence, I am not happy with crop the bottom part but I want just without the fence composition... --Laitche (talk) 17:35, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Support. It's slightly off symmetrical which is the most significant compositional issue for me. I agree the fence isn't ideal, but I don't think cropping it is a better solution. Diliff (talk) 20:47, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Ralf Roleček 21:17, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Comment These should be all the votes Jebulon removed. Laitche, would you please check? --Tremonist (talk) 12:24, 27 May 2015 (UTC)

@Tremonist: I think it's reverted. --Laitche (talk) 12:31, 27 May 2015 (UTC)

Ok, thank you! --Tremonist (talk) 12:34, 27 May 2015 (UTC)

My mistake, sorry.--Jebulon (talk) 17:30, 27 May 2015 (UTC)

•  Support -- Christian Ferrer 11:31, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Hubertl (talk) 18:39, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Johann Jaritz (talk) Johann Jaritz 09:37, 31 May 2015 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 2 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 13:17, 31 May 2015 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Cityscapes