Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Kandiszucker -- 2018 -- 3590.jpg

File:Kandiszucker -- 2018 -- 3590.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Nov 2018 at 19:32:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Kandiszucker -- 2018 -- 3590.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Kandiszucker -- 2018 -- 3590.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Food_and_drink#Food
•  Info created and uploaded and nominated by XRay -- XRay ^talk 19:32, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- XRay ^talk 19:32, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose Sorry, too many unsharp areas; would have been an ideal object for focus stacking --Llez (talk) 20:33, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
•  Support Excellent composition, excellent picture: this is not a mere desription of candies, and unfocused areas are perfect to add depth to the subject, nice colours, good choice.Paolobon140 (talk) 21:26, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 05:17, 7 November 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose I can live with non-stacked images, but so much more could have been done with this. Cloning out the little sugar particles for one and some more light reflecting in and playing around in the transparent crystals could have worked wonders for the image. Also, why chose such damaged candy crystals when it's so easy to get hold of nice ones. --Cart (talk) 16:43, 7 November 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Cart. I think a tighter crop could also have worked some wonders. Daniel Case (talk) 17:08, 7 November 2018 (UTC)
•  Support Wow per Paolobon --Habitator terrae 🌍 18:39, 7 November 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose Not enough DoF. Charles (talk) 20:13, 7 November 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose Not bad at first sight, it reminds me these sugars, but for this picture the quality is deceiving at full size -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:49, 8 November 2018 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 4 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Cart (talk) 20:08, 15 November 2018 (UTC)