Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Julia Margaret Cameron - Ellen Terry at Age Sixteen - Google Art Project.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Julia Margaret Cameron - Ellen Terry at Age Sixteen - Google Art Project.jpg, not featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Jan 2019 at 09:52:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/People
Info created by Julia Margaret Cameron / Google Art Project, retouched by Keraunoscopia, uploaded and nominated by Yann (talk) 09:52, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
Support -- Yann (talk) 09:52, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
Strong oppose Why is this image, which claims to be from the "Google Art Project" (in both title and body text) totally changed in colour from the original brown? There's nothing in the file description or title I can see to indicate this is Yann's derivative work (other than links to it claim "better colour"). We already have this image in the correct colours on Commons. Don't you remember Jan got indef blocked for this sort of thing? I see you have also substituted your personal colour change onto the Wikipedia article and elsewhere. That has removed an existing Wikipedia Featured Picture. Btw, the Wikipedia FP of the other image noted that this is ultimately taken from a larger photo that is damaged. -- Colin (talk) 14:30, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
- @Colin: The original is not brown, but pink. I simply removed the pink stain. Why do you want to keep it? BTW the image you linked is sepia, contrary to the GAP one. And your reference to Jan is insulting. Please remove that. Regards, Yann (talk) 15:33, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
- Yann, can you link to the "original" you think is pink. I see a google file and a Getty page. Both are the same brown as the original Commons file. Yours is greenish. What makes you think it is "stained" and why do you to upload to Commons a file that is not what you claim it is -- this is not the image from Google Art Projec--Colin (talk) 16:52, 16 January 2019 (UTC)--Colin (talk) 16:52, 16 January 2019 (UTC)t. The "source" links to a different coloured image. That is exactly the sort of misrepresentation of archive photos that got Jan into trouble. I am wondering if your PC or browser is not setup correctly. -- Colin (talk) 15:50, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
- Greenish??? This is nonsense. And my laptop is fine. Here is a real sepia version. Regards, Yann (talk) 16:21, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
- Yann, regardless of what colours you see on your laptop, it is nothing like the colours of the source image or the copy at Getty museum. Can we at least agree on that? And can we agree that the community, when discussing Jan's uploads, were very upset that he misrepresented the source archive. Do you think you know better than the experts at Getty? Jan did, and it got him an indef block. I really, really, don't know why this needs explaining. And I don't know why you've just uploaded yet another "Yann-Special-Colours" version that doesn't say this on the file description page. Sticking "-sepia" on the filename doesn't "explain" what you did. Please can you amend the "Source" to indicate which images you've altered from the true source, and what changes you made. -- Colin (talk) 16:52, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
Comment - I think Colin is right. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:13, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination Nevermind, I will do something else. Yann (talk) 17:29, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Basile Morin (talk) 01:15, 18 January 2019 (UTC)
