Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Javari Temple, Khajuraho.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Javari Temple, Khajuraho.jpg, not featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Nov 2013 at 15:17:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Info c/u/n by Dey.sandip -- Dey.sandip (talk) 15:17, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
- Support -- Dey.sandip (talk) 15:17, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
- Neutral Very nice light, but the crop could be wider at the top and tighter at the bottom. In addition there seems to be a small burned out region in the temple. -- Norbert Nagel (talk) 20:35, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks for the feedback, I wanted to include the shadows on the grass, because it improves the balance of the photo and gives it an aesthetic appeal. If you can annotate the overexposed region in the temple, I can cross-check and may be do some selective highlight recovery there. -- Dey.sandip (talk) 05:27, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
- Oppose The composition doesn't work for me, sorry. I think there should be more sky and less grass. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 16:28, 21 November 2013 (UTC)
- Unfortunately, I don't have a frame where there is more of the sky. I can crop the bottom to show less grass, if that works. In that case, I can upload a new crop -- Dey.sandip (talk) 10:44, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
- Request is the basement really bent that much or is this a lens distortion? --P e z i (talk) 17:07, 21 November 2013 (UTC)
- I thought I had accounted for the lens distortion and fixed that. If there is no lens distortion, the base would be as it is. I'll cross check and if required, will upload a new version --Dey.sandip (talk) 10:44, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
- Comment I have checked the distortion (confirmed that the temple base is like that only), fixed the annotated overexposed region and also tried a new crop to cut down on the grass and improve balance. The new version has been uploaded. Kindly review --Dey.sandip (talk) 15:52, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 1 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /A.Savin 00:22, 25 November 2013 (UTC)