Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Igreja de Nossa Senhora do Rosário (Vila Velha).jpg

File:Igreja de Nossa Senhora do Rosário (Vila Velha).jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Feb 2024 at 20:50:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Igreja de Nossa Senhora do Rosário (Vila Velha).jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Igreja de Nossa Senhora do Rosário (Vila Velha).jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings#Brazil
•  Info Interior of the Church of Our Lady of the Rosary, Vila Velha, Espírito Santo, Brazil. Created, uploaded and nominated by ★ -- ★ 20:50, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
•  Support -- ★ 20:50, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
•  Support Юрий Д.К 10:41, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
•  Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 13:48, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
•  Oppose This was a good effort at a church interior. It is well framed, with the side altars included, and I think the church is really interesting. But it isn't very sharp/detailed at full size and also it's not centred. Cmao20 (talk) 22:21, 16 February 2024 (UTC)

  But it's a QI. ★ 23:09, 16 February 2024 (UTC)

•  Oppose per Cmao20. I'm not sure it should have been a QI, but being a QI is not a good argument for it to be an FP. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:23, 17 February 2024 (UTC)

  If it's a QI, the quality is good in principle, or the ways they review there are very shallow. ★ 09:16, 17 February 2024 (UTC)

• Honestly, yes, it is frequently pretty shallow. FP is about promoting the absolute best and it's natural that we should want to hold images to higher quality standards. Cmao20 (talk) 12:10, 17 February 2024 (UTC)

• Not only that, but QIC and FPC have different criteria, and photos can justly be FPs but not QIs as well as the converse. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 12:52, 17 February 2024 (UTC)

• The bar for QI would challenge the very best limbo dancer. Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:26, 17 February 2024 (UTC)

  I nominated this one just because it was promoted to QI; but, conclusively, QI guidelines/reviews are not parameterized at all. ★ 17:41, 17 February 2024 (UTC)

   I withdraw my nomination ★ 10:36, 18 February 2024 (UTC)