Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Grand hotell Saltsjöbaden February 2013 02.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Grand hotell Saltsjöbaden February 2013 02.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Nov 2013 at 23:49:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info Grand hotel Saltsjöbaden built in the 1890s by the Wallenberg family. In the background, the local railway (Saltsjöbanan), also built by Wallenberg and completed in 1893 (connected Saltsjöbaden with Stockholm). The hotel was the location of Saltsjöbaden Agreement in 1938 and host the annual meeting of the Bilderberg Group in 1962, 1973 and 1984. Created, uploaded and nominated by -- Arild Vågen (talk) 23:49, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Support -- ArildV (talk) 23:49, 18 November 2013 (UTC)- Support Yann (talk) 07:59, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
- Support Great view, and valuable. --99of9 (talk) 09:50, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
- Support Good composition, nice light, high quality for an aerial photograph. --Tuxyso (talk) 10:57, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
- Support Per Tuxyso --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:06, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
- Support --Joydeep Talk 18:16, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
- Support -- Norbert Nagel (talk) 20:42, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
Comment It is ccw tilted Poco2 21:08, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
Done.--ArildV (talk) 10:55, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
Oppose caothic and bad cut--Pava (talk) 01:20, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
- It would be helpful if you could explain what in the composition that is bad and chaotic. What could have been done better?--ArildV (talk) 10:55, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
- take a picture focusing it more on the subject, choosing a period without snow, or with all the snow, not that the game snow / ground is identical to the roof / wall building. Better cut the top of the photographs, no special frame is not useful to the purpose of the picture. --Pava (talk) 14:28, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
- Snow on aerial photographs is controversial debated, that's right. But for this region it illustrates the subject very well. But I can barely follow your argument on a "bad and chaotic" composition. It is very well framed (the streets / footways weave well all around the building and all meet at the roundabout in the back of the building), perfectly cropped at the left, the "cross" in the foreground is an interesting counterpart to the building. I do not know how I had done this shot better, and remember: it's an aerial shot with a VERY limited time slot. --Tuxyso (talk) 20:26, 21 November 2013 (UTC)
- take a picture focusing it more on the subject, choosing a period without snow, or with all the snow, not that the game snow / ground is identical to the roof / wall building. Better cut the top of the photographs, no special frame is not useful to the purpose of the picture. --Pava (talk) 14:28, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
- It would be helpful if you could explain what in the composition that is bad and chaotic. What could have been done better?--ArildV (talk) 10:55, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
- Support JKadavoor Jee 06:10, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
- Support --Ralf Roleček 07:54, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
- Support --JLPC (talk) 08:44, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
- Support St1995 15:33, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
- Support --Ivar (talk) 16:19, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
- Support Michael Barera (talk) 00:09, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
- Support イントレピッドサンダー (talk) 19:36, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture
