Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Grönskär February 2013 04.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Grönskär February 2013 04.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Nov 2013 at 10:21:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Info Grönskär is a Swedish island and lighthouse station located in the south Stockholm archipelago, east of Sandhamn. Created, uploaded and nominated by -- Arild Vågen (talk) 10:21, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
- Support -- ArildV (talk) 10:21, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
- Support--Jebulon (talk) 20:26, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
- Support --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:56, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
- Support --Joydeep Talk 12:38, 28 October 2013 (UTC)
- Support --JLPC (talk) 14:51, 28 October 2013 (UTC)
- Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 15:29, 28 October 2013 (UTC)
- Support --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:24, 28 October 2013 (UTC)
- Support --Pine✉ 07:15, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
- Support --Böhringer (talk) 11:29, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
- Comment Nice, but it is ccw tilted Poco2 21:04, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
- Done--ArildV (talk) 13:36, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
- Support --Kikos (talk) 21:07, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
- Support nice view. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 22:28, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
- Neutral View is pretty nice, though I would have liked to see more of the blue sea and less of the foreground land. A re-compose with more sea and carefully placed land portion would have made this an excellent image with good asthetics --Dey.sandip (talk) 08:01, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
- I feel the opposite, I would have preferred more exciting rock and less water. But good quality though. --V-wolf (talk) 12:31, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks for your comments. I thought it was a good compromise between land and water. Anyway, many have already voted now so I wouldn't change the composition. I uploaded a uncut version and a new overall view.--ArildV (talk) 13:36, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
- Like the uncut version --Dey.sandip (talk) 11:19, 31 October 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks for your comments. I thought it was a good compromise between land and water. Anyway, many have already voted now so I wouldn't change the composition. I uploaded a uncut version and a new overall view.--ArildV (talk) 13:36, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
- I feel the opposite, I would have preferred more exciting rock and less water. But good quality though. --V-wolf (talk) 12:31, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
- Support Blurred Lines 13:54, 30 October 2013 (UTC)