Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Gemini 7 in orbit - GPN-2006-000035.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Gemini 7 in orbit - GPN-2006-000035.jpg, not featured
[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Jun 2012 at 18:41:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info created by NASA - uploaded by BotMultichillT - nominated by Soerfm -- Soerfm (talk) 18:41, 25 May 2012 (UTC)
Support -- Soerfm (talk) 18:41, 25 May 2012 (UTC)- Support -- Gildir (talk) 19:14, 25 May 2012 (UTC)
- Support--Telemaque MySon (talk) 06:53, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
- Support--Andrew J.Kurbiko (talk) 23:38, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
Oppose Blurred foreground is too distracting. Yann (talk) 05:50, 27 May 2012 (UTC)- Oppose per Yann. Tomer T (talk) 09:18, 27 May 2012 (UTC)
Comment I think on the other side it contribute to add technical insight from where the picture was taken... All is distance in this picture. Cut the foreground aspect and you lose one degree in the comparison. --Telemaque MySon (talk) 15:53, 27 May 2012 (UTC)
- weak oppose per Yann. --SteGrifo27 (tell me) 11:13, 28 May 2012 (UTC)
- Support--David საქართველო 14:49, 28 May 2012 (UTC)
- Oppose see nothing Zivya (talk) 16:52, 28 May 2012 (UTC)
- Support Great colors and shadows for picture taken in space -- ☭Acodered (talk) 17:20, 28 May 2012 (UTC)
- Oppose simply a bad composition. Distracting foreground. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 19:18, 28 May 2012 (UTC)
- Support-- It is a great photo showing a milestone in manned space flight. Too bad we can't ask the crew of Gemini 6 for a do over. They used a 70mm Hasselblad camera with 80 mm and 250 mm lens. Focus stacking was not available at that time. Swtpc6800 (talk) 19:23, 28 May 2012 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 7 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 20:17, 3 June 2012 (UTC)
