Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Galtür - Pferdekopf 01.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Galtür - Pferdekopf 01.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Aug 2017 at 15:28:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals#Equidae
Info All by me. -- Basotxerri (talk) 15:28, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
Comment I know that the bar for horse FPs is quite high but I've received positive feedback about it, so I'm going to try it with this one. --Basotxerri (talk) 15:28, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
Support -- Basotxerri (talk) 15:28, 1 August 2017 (UTC)- Support Sided light and colours are gorgeous. -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 16:14, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
- Support Love the profile view and sharp, detailed hair. PumpkinSky talk 17:16, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
- Comment ...shot using a 30-year old 20$ Ricoh vintage lens, by the way...
--Basotxerri (talk) 18:24, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
- Comment ;-) PumpkinSky talk 19:25, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
- Support -- Pofka (talk) 19:14, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
- Comment - I'd like a little more room to the right of the horse's head. Is that possible? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:42, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks Ikan for the comment, exactly that's the problem: as you can see in the file history, there is a former version with more space on the right. However, there was another horse in the blurred back which someone could consider a nervous background. I'm not sure what's your opinion but I decided to crop it out. What do you think? --Basotxerri (talk) 20:50, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
- I agree that the previous version was worse because the background was bad. I'll make a decision about this photo and post it later. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:48, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
- Perhaps cloning out the other horse and then giving this one a bit more nose room.PumpkinSky talk 01:15, 2 August 2017 (UTC)
Oppose- Support Good work for the cloning. --Yann (talk) 09:03, 2 August 2017 (UTC)
- Weak support It is a tight crop, but ... it's a picture of a horse's head. It's not trying to be anything else. Daniel Case (talk) 02:41, 2 August 2017 (UTC)
- Comment I uploaded a no cropped version but with the disturbing out of focus horse cloned out, please revert if you don't like, or I can upload it in a separate file if it is an issue. Regards, Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:24, 2 August 2017 (UTC)
- Thank you, Christian, that was very, very kind of you! --Basotxerri (talk) 15:29, 2 August 2017 (UTC)
- Support per Daniel before and per Christian now --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 05:29, 2 August 2017 (UTC)
- Support - I'll vote for this now, but none of you thinks this kind of cloning out is cheating? I know it seems to be accepted as a matter of course here, but why? Perhaps that's a topic better discussed on the talk page. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:21, 2 August 2017 (UTC)
- Support I was on the fence about this one because of the tight cut before. I don't mind removing the other horse, they are not permanent fixtures and it was such a small part of the photo. A bug flying in front of the lens at the wrong moment could have caused just as much disturbance and no one would have thought twice about removing it. --cart-Talk 07:49, 2 August 2017 (UTC)
- Support --Hockei (talk) 10:36, 2 August 2017 (UTC)
- Support Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:02, 2 August 2017 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 11:24, 2 August 2017 (UTC)
- Support -- Colin (talk) 17:36, 2 August 2017 (UTC)
- Support Daphne Lantier 19:43, 2 August 2017 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Mammals#Equidae
