Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Fountain water droplets.jpg

File:Fountain water droplets.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Jun 2015 at 09:17:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Fountain water droplets.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Fountain water droplets.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured_pictures/Natural_phenomena#Liquid
•  Info Fountain water droplets as seen on very short time exsposure of 1/16.000 s. Total internal reflection can be observed on "brigth" droplets. A Brewster angle if lucky. --Mile (talk) 09:17, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
•  Support -- Mile (talk) 09:17, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
•  Comment Nice but too much CAs. Please have a look to the droplets.--XRay ^talk 10:44, 5 June 2015 (UTC)

•  Comment There is some, but due to nature of it, you cant just move "cursor" in software and remove it. This is refraction-diffraction-polarization mess, that is about it. Also, CA is very rare, you probably messed up with diffraction. --Mile (talk) 11:18, 5 June 2015 (UTC)

•  Support WoW ....I don't see CA,for me is a real diffraction. --LivioAndronico talk 11:50, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 11:54, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
•  Comment I think there are CAs (maybe some like Purple fringing) but it is unavoidable for this kind of shot ,IMO :) --Laitche (talk) 12:13, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
•  Support but Natural places? It's right? 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 12:18, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
•  Info ArionEstar : it just Natural (scenes), not Natural places. I think its OK, since about nature. CA issue: i did remove some near UV spectre on left. Which migth bother some, despite i am still not sure if it was rigth. Purple yes, but when you see near circular almost nice diffraction band then one migth not be sure. I did remove most obvios one. The purple has bad reputation. However, my thinking: due to very extensive diffraction, lens couldnt handle the extensive UV spectre well, i think UV filter migth help at such situation. CA is problem of backligth, and here is probably not an issue. --Mile (talk) 12:43, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Extraordinary vista! :) --Tremonist (talk) 13:09, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
•  Neutral I fancy water drops shot like this and think well done with 1/16,000 sec exposure but this composition does not work for me. --Laitche (talk) 16:06, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
•  Comment I fixed the category to Places as Places/natural is more for nature views and/or landscape. -- Christian Ferrer 18:01, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
•  Support -- Pofka (talk) 19:31, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
•  Support like usually, I am amazed by your pictures. Well done. --Јованвб (talk) 20:01, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Soundwaweserb (talk) 20:34, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
•  Support - Good shot. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 01:57, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose VERY distracting background. This is not a difficult shot at all, just freeze the movement. A tele-lens would have been a better choice. --Kadellar (talk) 10:39, 6 June 2015 (UTC)

• A flash light from the back of the droplets would have been useful too. --Kadellar (talk) 10:59, 6 June 2015 (UTC)

•  Info I must say this was not easy shot. Its made on second level of this fountain. I made jump on first level, put hands above the head, and make a shot, water was bursting everywhere, i got some of it on camera. This was best shot from 5-6, made of 3 jumps (standing there still isnt possible, its rounded). On first level droplets arent so nicely distributed. --Mile (talk) 13:03, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
•  Comment Agree with Kadellar about the background, I guess not a few supporters may be You cannot see the wood for the trees.... --Laitche (talk) 11:41, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Albertus teolog (talk) 17:08, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Avala (talk) 18:05, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Unusual and nice. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 19:09, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per Kadellar; phenomenal work on the droplets but it should have been done against a less distracting background. Daniel Case (talk) 03:53, 7 June 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose distracting background --El Grafo (talk) 09:21, 7 June 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Kadellar. — Julian H.^✈ 20:08, 7 June 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose As aobve. --Karelj (talk) 21:24, 8 June 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Unusual and nice. -- Bojan  Talk  13:35, 9 June 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose As aobve. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 22:33, 10 June 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Σπάρτακος (talk) 13:22, 12 June 2015 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 14 support, 6 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /Laitche (talk) 14:11, 14 June 2015 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Natural_phenomena#Liquid