Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Fomes fomentarius 2010 G2.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Fomes fomentarius 2010 G2.jpg, not featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Sep 2010 at 11:00:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info c/u/n by User:George Chernilevsky -- George Chernilevsky talk 11:00, 7 September 2010 (UTC)- Info Tinder fungus (Fomes fomentarius) on a dead birch. Approximately 10 years old mushroom. Brown edge at bottom is new part in 2010.
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 11:00, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
Oppose sorry but I don't like the composition that much. The left green side doesn't comes so good imo. Maybe another position where you can only see the mushroom on the birch would be better?! Sorry, mathias K 15:08, 7 September 2010 (UTC)- Support --The High Fin Sperm Whale 16:04, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
- Support Not spectacular maybe, but high encyclopedic value, very good technically. Easily featurable IMO--Jebulon (talk) 22:45, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
- Support Per Jebulon. ~Kevin Payravi (Talk) 23:38, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
- Support Very nice.--Mbz1 (talk) 16:05, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose - Serves its purpose well, and I think this is an easy choice for QI, but not quite as spectacular or unique as I'd expect from an FP. Sorry. –Juliancolton | Talk 19:13, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
- Support - ditto to Jebulon - MPF (talk) 08:34, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
Neutral QI? Perhaps yes, but I think that it's not FP (DOF, composition, dark areas, sharp...) ... but high encyclopedic value--Luis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez (talk) 19:43, 13 September 2010 (UTC)- weak Oppose: see Mathias, Juliancolton and Lmbuga, sorry --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 16:42, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
- Neutral Good detail, but unspectacular, background's a bit distracting. --IdLoveOne (talk) 18:37, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose BG looks a tad overexposed and disturbs. Lycaon (talk) 09:17, 16 September 2010 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 6 support, 4 oppose, 2 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 13:07, 16 September 2010 (UTC)
