Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Flowers-2.JPG
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Flowers-2.JPG, not featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Feb 2011 at 20:57:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Info created by Captain - uploaded by Captain - nominated by Captain -- ...Captain......Tälk tö me.. 20:57, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
- Abstain As nominator -- ...Captain......Tälk tö me.. 20:57, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
- Comment "Private collection" is not a good enough description; it should include a botanical name. Are these petunias? --Avenue (talk) 23:42, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
Oppose because of poor categorization and description. --Admrboltz (talk) 03:12, 28 January 2011 (UTC)- Comment - As uploader i have no idea what is this flower, i just got it from a park, Does categories affect photographs..??
- Per Commons:Image_guidelines#Image_page_requirements the image should be properly categorized, and when it comes to animals, plants, etc, that means specific categories, not just Flowers. --Admrboltz (talk) 07:39, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
- Done - Please see the image cat's & descriptions...
- Support Support now. Interesting composition and color. --Admrboltz (talk) 07:58, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
- Comment - As uploader i have no idea what is this flower, i just got it from a park, Does categories affect photographs..??
- Oppose Colors are interesting, but very little of the parts that had to be sharp, are. W.S. 07:52, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
- Oppose The main subject is blurry in parts, i.e. not focussed. Some of the insects on this flower look like noise spots.
Also, its impossible for me to support an image that has been nominated for deletion, so please do resolve that issue.--Snaevar (talk) 13:03, 28 January 2011 (UTC) - Info File is not listed for deletion, it was done by a user ignited after his talks on several deletion requests files by me...--...Captain......Tälk tö me.. 14:56, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
- Ok, thanks for clarifying.--Snaevar (talk) 16:19, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
- Is it a new blossom or an old one? I can never tell with petunias unless I'm there to feel them. –Juliancolton | Talk 17:49, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
- Info I am not sure, but think its an old one (Petunias will hold the old ones..) ...Captain......Tälk tö me.. 17:54, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
- Info It looks new to me, its too bright to be old. --Admrboltz (talk) 20:45, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
- Support Great colors! --Aktron (talk) 10:39, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
- Support The colors are fantastic! TFCforever (talk) 18:30, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
SupportGreat! Jack21- As a user of less than 50 edits you don´t have the right to vote.--Snaevar (talk) 23:33, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
- Oppose Bad detail, blurry or unsharp--Miguel Bugallo 00:43, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
- Info - The noted subjects are insects, small ants, quite natural.....Captain......Tälk tö me.. 03:44, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
- Oppose -- Out of focus, messy composition. Nice colours is not enough. Alvesgaspar (talk) 08:58, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
- Support love that halo! –hoverFly | chat? 17:46, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 4 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 22:26, 6 February 2011 (UTC)