Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:File:Coracias caudatus Lilac breasted Roller.JPG
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Coracias caudatus Lilac breasted Roller.JPG, not featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Feb 2010 at 10:29:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info created by Yoky - uploaded by Yoky - nominated by JarlBompe -- JarlBompe (talk) 10:29, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
Support -- JarlBompe (talk) 10:29, 31 January 2010 (UTC)- Support —kallerna™ 11:50, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
- Support --Schnobby (talk) 13:12, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
- Support Nice colors. ■ MMXX talk 13:15, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
Oppose Nice subject, composition and colours. But low resolution (<600 KB) andCA at right (blue-green and violet fringes). --Cayambe (talk) 16:12, 31 January 2010 (UTC)- There's a difference between resolution and image size. What you mention (<600kb) is the storage space the image occupies. This picture has more than the necessary 2megapixels resolution --Muhammad (talk) 16:50, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
- Oops, you are right. 'Strikethrough' above for that. --Cayambe (talk) 17:01, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
Question Is it possible to have this image with less aggressive JPEG compression? I see small chessboards all around the image. They may be caused by the high JPEG compression, but I'm not sure. Anyway, the composition is good and the subject interesting. --MattiPaavola (talk) 21:47, 31 January 2010 (UTC)- Oppose As Matti noticed, there are a lot of jpeg artifacts, I will support an uncompressed version if you have. Great composition. --Phyrexian (talk) 16:55, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose Alas I have to agree with the others. --99of9 (talk) 05:30, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose - Tiptoety talk 05:10, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 4 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 10:39, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
