Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Fat Albert low level pass.jpg

File:Fat Albert low level pass.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Apr 2014 at 04:32:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Fat Albert low level pass.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Fat Albert low level pass.jpg

•  Info created by Staff Sgt. Oscar L. Olive IV, U.S. Marine Corps - uploaded by Russavia - nominated by Russavia -- russavia (talk) 04:32, 28 March 2014 (UTC)
•  Support -- russavia (talk) 04:32, 28 March 2014 (UTC)
•  Comment The fact these guys were not given ear defenders is unconscionable. That aside, love the pic, but not happy about the tightness on the top and bottom for the last Marine. Saffron Blaze (talk) 05:42, 28 March 2014 (UTC)
•  Comment The crop is ok. Could even be tighter. Amazing picture. I hope it will be featured.--192.36.80.8 09:15, 28 March 2014 (UTC)
•  Support amazing! --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 09:52, 28 March 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose if this image is suppose to show the plane doing a low level pass then the people obscure that, if the people are meant to show how low the plane is then the angle fails to clearly show that Gnangarra 10:58, 28 March 2014 (UTC)
  • The photo isn't supposed to show only one of those things, it is supposed to show both things in combination, and also to show the (non) reaction of the Marines. This photo does that quite magnificently. russavia (talk) 17:30, 28 March 2014 (UTC)
    • as I said if the photo is suppose to show how low the plane is in relation to the people then the angle fails to clearly show that. Gnangarra 05:16, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose plane very unsharp (yes, it's moving perpendicular to the focal plane, but this is too much). Chromatic aberrations (white trousers of soldier at left, trousers, hat, and shoulder of front soldier on the right). Noisy shadows on the faces. Lupo 11:23, 28 March 2014 (UTC)
•  Support Super. --Karelj (talk) 17:39, 28 March 2014 (UTC)

 Comment If someone is up for fixing the minor tech issues please address all the sensor spots as well. The photographer's sensor was filthy. Saffron Blaze (talk) 17:42, 28 March 2014 (UTC)

•  Oppose Tigth crop. --Mile (talk) 19:55, 28 March 2014 (UTC)
•  Neutral until plenty of sensor dust and massive CAs especially at white parts of the trousers are removed. Otherwise this photo is really impressive and should become an FP. --Tuxyso (talk) 07:35, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
•  Comment Dust spots and CA removed. Noise slightly reduced. -- Norbert Nagel (talk) 10:38, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
•  Support Now clearly pro. An outstanding photo. --Tuxyso (talk) 14:12, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
•  Support Great moment. It doesn't disturb me the lack of sharpness of the plane, if it would be sharp I would probably be irritated about sharp marines with helices and wings emerging out of their heads Poco² 15:18, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose per other opposes. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 17:58, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
  • Without you there are currently more supporters than opposers thus your vote has to be pro if one takes "per other[s]" seriously :) --Tuxyso (talk) 19:23, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
    • , OK, now with more clarification. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 21:16, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
•  Support Michael Barera (talk) 01:35, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
•  Support --Jwh (talk) 08:12, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
•  Support --EveryPicture (talk) 13:49, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
•  Support -- Sanyambahga (talk) 06:06, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
•  Support Great image (and per Poco²) --PierreSelim (talk) 06:40, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
•  Support Really a great image. Jacopo Werther ^iγ∂ψ=mψ 08:51, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
•  Support --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 09:17, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
•  Support --ArildV (talk) 15:04, 5 April 2014 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 13 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Jee 05:21, 6 April 2014 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Vehicles