Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Falco sparverius cinnamonimus.jpg

File:Falco sparverius cinnamonimus.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Feb 2011 at 19:36:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Falco sparverius cinnamonimus.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Falco sparverius cinnamonimus.jpg

•  Info created by Fernando da Rosa - nominated by Marinna (talk) 19:36, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
•  Support -- Marinna (talk) 19:36, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
•  Support -- Ismael Luceno (talk) 20:59, 23 January 2011 (UTC) Only two edits. W.S. 06:49, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
•  Support Just wish they'd gotten the rest of the tail, but no real loss. -- IdLoveOne (talk) 21:36, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
•  Support Great composition, even with the tail cropped out. The direct gaze is particularly striking. Steven Walling 22:00, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
•  Support I would like that the whole tail was seen, but I like the composition--Miguel Bugallo 22:25, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
•  Support Per those above. --The High Fin Sperm Whale 22:44, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
•  Neutral Lens flare and tail cut off.--Snaevar (talk) 00:19, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
•  Support Would not be difficult to clone out the lens flare, but I don´t mind it at all in this case.--Nikopol (talk) 00:37, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose As Snaevar. A poorly cropped image for FP? what next? W.S. 08:15, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose Sharp but bad composition - bird is cut off. --Mile (talk) 08:51, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
•  Support --Màñü飆¹5 ^talk 12:48, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose As Snaevar and Mile. --Bgag (talk) 14:13, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
•  Support The image is very beatiful and it's very good about creating. --Tokvo (talk) 14:38, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
  • As a user of less than 50 edits you don´t have the right to vote.--Snaevar (talk) 16:00, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
•  Support --Fadesga (talk) 16:01, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
•  Support --Galandil (talk) 17:44, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
•  Support -- Though I'd have loved it better cropped, it should still be featured. --Izmir2 (talk) 17:55, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose The tail...--Jebulon (talk) 18:49, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose - interesting; would likely support if not for the unfortunate crop of the tail. Jonathunder (talk) 20:50, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose bad crop: the tail ... --Alchemist-hp (talk) 23:43, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose Bad crop --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:30, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
•  Weak support Great, but don't like the crop. However, it isn't all that easy to get a pix like this one! –hoverFly | chat? 01:48, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
•  Support The direct gaze of this bird is amazing, you just do not pay attention to the crop of the tail. --MotherForker (talk) 13:24, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
•  Support Tail it´s a minor detail. The animal it´s ready to fly watching the camera. I think it´s a pretty much hard work and a ver good picture. --Andrea (talk) 19:47, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
•  Support --Esteban (talk) 21:53, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose : end of tail missing. Snowmanradio (talk) 14:59, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
•  Support Hmmm. It's a good "capture"... despite the tail-cropping ;) Good work. Tirithel (talk) 22:41, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
•  Weak support Per hoverFly. TFCforever (talk) 17:57, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per others above --Cephas (talk) 19:59, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose cut tail hurts. --ELEKHH^T 11:18, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
•  Neutral Excellent work --The Photographer (talk) 01:45, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Support --SHION (talk) 13:06, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Account age and number of edits too low.--Snaevar (talk) 13:19, 1 February 2011 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 16 support, 10 oppose, 2 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 07:31, 2 February 2011 (UTC)