Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Füssen - Klosterkirche St. Mang2.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Füssen - Klosterkirche St. Mang2.jpg, not featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Nov 2011 at 21:44:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info all by Wladyslaw -- Wladyslaw (talk) 21:44, 20 November 2011 (UTC)
Support -- Wladyslaw (talk) 21:44, 20 November 2011 (UTC)- Support - lovely ! --Xijky (talk) 10:38, 21 November 2011 (UTC)
- Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 07:54, 23 November 2011 (UTC)
- Support --Karelj (talk) 16:03, 24 November 2011 (UTC)
Oppose I find the tiles in the lower right corner distracting.Good photo, nice light, fairly good composition and colors, but not splendid quality given the relatively easy to photograph subject. The shadow of the church tower on some buildings is a little unfortunate. I looked for the EXIF to find time-of-day info, but did not find any? I guess it must have been relatively close to noon? I think that a morning or evening photo would have given a more delicate, soft light on the subject (depending on the orientation of the building relative to the sun). --Slaunger (talk) 23:03, 24 November 2011 (UTC)
- This church is everything else than a "relatively easy to photograph subject". And I like the tiles at the bottom, but it is a matter of taste. --Wladyslaw (talk) 07:14, 25 November 2011 (UTC)
- Concerning the tiles, on second thought, they actually play a useful role. They add a sense of depth, they illustrate that you have taken the photo from another building(?), and the slope fits compositionally well with the street. But why is the subject (which I guess is not only the church, but also its surroundings) "everything else than a relatively easy to photograph subject"? I mean, the object is static, it will be there tomorrow and next year, and the buildings themselves are visually attractive? Is it getting to a good view of the scenary, which is hard? --Slaunger (talk) 07:43, 25 November 2011 (UTC)
- I have added now object and camera location of this shot. Church and complex are located very closly to Castle Füssen so this condition makes it difficult to find a good location showing all relevant buildings without strong distortions. For verifying look at the geolocation and other pictures showing a similar view of the complex. --Wladyslaw (talk) 07:59, 25 November 2011 (UTC)
- Picture was taken about 4 pm similar to this shot File:Füssen - Klosterkirche St. Mang3.jpg. Waiting longer would mean that the Castle would cast a shadow to this church. Making the picture earlier would mean getting back light. This picture is of course a stitching of several single shots. --Wladyslaw (talk) 08:08, 25 November 2011 (UTC)
- Concerning the tiles, on second thought, they actually play a useful role. They add a sense of depth, they illustrate that you have taken the photo from another building(?), and the slope fits compositionally well with the street. But why is the subject (which I guess is not only the church, but also its surroundings) "everything else than a relatively easy to photograph subject"? I mean, the object is static, it will be there tomorrow and next year, and the buildings themselves are visually attractive? Is it getting to a good view of the scenary, which is hard? --Slaunger (talk) 07:43, 25 November 2011 (UTC)
- This church is everything else than a "relatively easy to photograph subject". And I like the tiles at the bottom, but it is a matter of taste. --Wladyslaw (talk) 07:14, 25 November 2011 (UTC)
Comment Adding geodata to the file page would be helpful. --Slaunger (talk) 23:05, 24 November 2011 (UTC)- Oppose full ack. Slaunger. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 02:32, 25 November 2011 (UTC)
- Support alofok* 20:38, 25 November 2011 (UTC)
- Oppose I don't like composition. --Claus (talk) 08:01, 29 November 2011 (UTC)
- because of? --Wladyslaw (talk) 08:02, 29 November 2011 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 5 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 07:14, 30 November 2011 (UTC)
